Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions
- PMID: 21536837
- PMCID: PMC3091006
- DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318218e1fb
Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the use of existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions and the role of extrinsic health care services in the design and conduct of behavioral trials.
Method: Selective qualitative review.
Results: Extrinsic health care services, also known as nonstudy care, have important but under-recognized effects on the design and conduct of behavioral trials. Usual care, treatment-as-usual, standard of care, and other existing practice control groups pose a variety of methodological and ethical challenges, but they play a vital role in behavioral intervention research.
Conclusions: This review highlights the need for a scientific consensus statement on control groups in behavioral trials.
References
-
- Rosenthal R. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1966.
-
- Paul GL. Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. J Consult Psychol. 1967;31(2):109–118. - PubMed
-
- Kazdin AE. Therapy analogues and clinical trials in psychotherapy research. In: Hersen M, Michelson L, Bellack AS, editors. Issues in psychotherapy research. New York: Plenum Press; 1984. pp. 227–250.
-
- Lang P, Lazovik A. Experimental desensitization of phobia. J Abn Soc Psychol. 1963;66(6):519–525. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources