Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2011 Jun;70(6):1074-9.
doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.148767.

Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study in four European countries

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Concepts of functioning and health important to people with systemic sclerosis: a qualitative study in four European countries

Tanja A Stamm et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the experiences of people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) in different European countries of functioning and health and to link these experiences to the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to develop a common understanding from a bio-psycho-social perspective.

Method: A qualitative multicentre study with focus-group interviews was performed in four European countries: Austria, Romania, Sweden and Switzerland. The qualitative data analysis followed a modified form of 'meaning condensation' and the concepts that emerged in the analysis were linked to the ICF.

Results: 63 people with SSc participated in 13 focus groups. In total, 86 concepts were identified. 32 (37%) of these were linked to the ICF component body functions and structures, 21 (24%) to activities and participation, 26 (30%) to environmental factors, 6 (7%) to personal factors and 1 (1%) to the health condition itself. 19 concepts (22%) were identified in all four countries and included impaired hand function, household activities, paid work, drugs, climate and coldness, support from others and experiences with healthcare institutions, non-pharmacological treatment, social security and benefits.

Conclusion: Concepts identified in all four countries could be used for guiding clinical assessment, as well as interdisciplinary team care and rheumatological rehabilitation for patients with SSc. For a full understanding of the aspects of the disease that were most relevant to people with SSc, people with SSc from multiple countries needed to be involved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An example of the qualitative analysis: a meaning unit, a lower-level concept extracted from this meaning unit and the corresponding higher-level concept and ICT category.

References

    1. White B. Immunopathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1996;22:695–708 - PubMed
    1. Clements PJ, Hurwitz EL, Wong WK, et al. Skin thickness score as a predictor and correlate of outcome in systemic sclerosis: high-dose versus low-dose penicillamine trial. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:2445–54 - PubMed
    1. Clements PJ, Lachenbruch PA, Ng SC, et al. Skin score. A semiquantitative measure of cutaneous involvement that improves prediction of prognosis in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1256–63 - PubMed
    1. Poole JL, Steen VD. The use of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) to determine physical disability in systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Care Res 1991;4:27–31 - PubMed
    1. Poole JL, Watzlaf VJ, D'amico F. A five-year followup of hand function and activities of daily living in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). J Hand Ther 2004;17:407–11 - PubMed

Publication types