Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Apr 25;6(4):e18435.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018435.

Risk factors for non-adherence and loss to follow-up in a three-year clinical trial in Botswana

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Risk factors for non-adherence and loss to follow-up in a three-year clinical trial in Botswana

Deborah A Gust et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Participant non-adherence and loss to follow-up can compromise the validity of clinical trial results. An assessment of these issues was made in a 3-year tuberculosis prevention trial among HIV-infected adults in Botswana.

Methods and findings: Between 11/2004-07/2006, 1995 participants were enrolled at eight public health clinics. They returned monthly to receive bottles of medication and were expected to take daily tablets of isoniazid or placebo for three years. Non-adherence was defined as refusing tablet ingestion but agreeing to quarterly physical examinations. Loss to follow-up was defined as not having returned for appointments in ≥60 days. Between 10/2008-04/2009, survey interviews were conducted with 83 participants identified as lost to follow-up and 127 identified as non-adherent. As a comparison, 252 randomly selected adherent participants were also surveyed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify associations with selected risk factors. Men had higher odds of being non-adherent (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.24; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.24-4.04) and lost to follow-up (AOR 3.08; 95%CI 1.50-6.33). Non-adherent participants had higher odds of reporting difficulties taking the regimen or not knowing if they had difficulties (AOR 3.40; 95%CI 1.75-6.60) and lower odds associated with each year of age (AOR 0.95; 95%CI 0.91-0.98), but other variables such as employment, distance from clinic, alcohol use, and understanding study requirements were not significantly different than controls. Among participants who were non-adherent or lost to follow-up, 40/210 (19.0%) reported that they stopped the medication because of work commitments and 33/210 (15.7%) said they thought they had completed the study.

Conclusions: Men had higher odds of non-adherence and loss to follow-up than women. Potential interventions that might improve adherence in trial participants may include:targeting health education for men, reducing barriers, clarifying study expectations, educating employers about HIV/AIDS to help reduce stigma in the workplace, and encouraging employers to support employee health.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00164281.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Derivation of cases and controls for the adherence sub-study from the cohort of HIV-infected persons enrolled in the Botswana Isoniazid Preventive Therapy Trial, 2004–2008.
Case-Non-adherent was defined as not taking the study medication due to unwillingness to take any more study medication but continuing to attend quarterly visits and seen at the last expected visit. Case-LosT to follow-up was defined as a participant who was still expected to take the study medication and receive monthly medication refills but missed the last visit by≥60 days. A control was defined as a participant who continued to be on study medication and was last seen within the expected visit window which was 7 days early or 14 days late in the 30-day study month. The median number of days since the last visit of those cases who were lost to follow-up was 396 days (range 91–1196), and 48 days (range 6–116) for the cases who were non-adherent. As the sub-study was conducted between 10/2008 AND 4/2009, 21 PARTICIPANTS HAS ALREADY COMPLETED THE RQUIRED 36 MONTHS OF OBSERVATION AND HAD VOLUNTARILY WITHDRAWN.

References

    1. Samandari T, Agizew T, Nyirenda S, Tedla Z, Sibanda T, et al. 6-month versus 36-month isoniazid preventive treatment for tuberculosis in adults with HIV-infection in Botswana:a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 in press. - PubMed
    1. Bucher HC, Griffith LE, Guyatt GH, Sudre P, Naef M, et al. Isoniazid prophylaxis for tuberculosis in HIV infection:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. AIDS. 1999;13:501–7. - PubMed
    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487–97. - PubMed
    1. Ngamvithayapong J, Uthaivoravit W, Yanai H, Akarasewi P, Sawanpanyalert P. Adherence to tuberculosis preventive therapy among HIV-infected persons in Chiang Rai, Thailand. AIDS. 1997;11:107–12. - PubMed
    1. Amico KR, Harman JJ, O'Grady MA. Attrition and related trends in scientific rigor:a score card for ART adherence intervention research and recommendations for future directions. Curr HIV /AIDS Rep. 2008;5:172–85. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data