Putting risk into perspective: the US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use
- PMID: 21541854
- DOI: 10.1007/s11154-011-9177-1
Putting risk into perspective: the US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use
Abstract
Unintended pregnancy remains a considerable problem in the United States, with health risks for both mother and infant. These risks may be increased among women with medical conditions, for whom pregnancy can lead to severe adverse outcomes. Highly effective and safe contraceptive methods are available to prevent unintended pregnancy. However, women with medical conditions and their providers also may be concerned about potential risks associated with contraceptive method use. Evidence-based guidance documents can be helpful tools for clinicians to efficiently use evidence and put risks into perspective. The US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010, provides evidence-based recommendations for the safety of contraceptive use among women with medical conditions and other characteristics. While some contraceptive methods pose risks for some women, these must be considered in context and weighed against such considerations as the absolute risk of adverse events and the risks associated with pregnancy. Most women, even women with medical conditions, can safely use highly effective methods of contraception and promoting their use will further efforts to reduce unintended pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Jun;20(6):825-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2851. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011. PMID: 21671772
-
Helping Clinicians Prevent Pregnancy among Sexually Active Adolescents: U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use and U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Aug;28(4):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 18. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26026219 Review.
-
Choosing the best contraceptive method for the adult with congenital heart disease.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009 Jul;11(4):298-305. doi: 10.1007/s11886-009-0043-7. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009. PMID: 19563730 Review.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
-
Update to U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016: Updated Recommendations for the Use of Contraception Among Women at High Risk for HIV Infection.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(14):405-410. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6914a3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020. PMID: 32271729 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A Web-Based Decision Tool to Improve Contraceptive Counseling for Women With Chronic Medical Conditions: Protocol For a Mixed Methods Implementation Study.JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Apr 18;7(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9249. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018. PMID: 29669707 Free PMC article.
-
Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.J Endocrinol Invest. 2013 May;36(5):358-63. doi: 10.3275/8882. Epub 2013 Feb 27. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013. PMID: 23449010 Review.
-
Contraception and the obese woman.J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013 May;25(5):223-33. doi: 10.1111/1745-7599.12011. Epub 2013 Feb 27. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2013. PMID: 24170564 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical