Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Apr;26(3):216-23.
doi: 10.1002/hup.1195.

Alcohol effects on simulated driving in frequent and infrequent binge drinkers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Alcohol effects on simulated driving in frequent and infrequent binge drinkers

Kimberly A Bernosky-Smith et al. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Compared with non‐bingers, binge drinkers are more likely to drive while intoxicated. The extent to which binge frequency impacts confidence in driving and subsequent driving impairment is unknown. This study compared the effects of an experimenter‐delivered alcohol binge on subjective impairment and simulated driving ability in female high‐frequency and low‐frequency bingers.

Methods: Female drinkers were assigned to high‐frequency (n = 30) or low‐frequency (n = 30) binge groups based on their Alcohol Use Questionnaire responses. At 30‐min intervals within a 2‐h period, participants received either a placebo drink (n = 15 per group) or a 0.2 g/kg dose of alcohol (n = 15 per group; cumulative dose 0.8 g/kg). Self‐reported impairment, driving confidence, and simulated driving were then measured.

Results: Self‐reported confidence in driving was significantly lower after alcohol than after placebo in low‐frequency but not highfrequency bingers. Self‐reported impairment and collisions during simulated driving were significantly greater after alcohol than after placebo in both low‐frequency and high‐frequency bingers.

Conclusions: The impairing effects of a single alcohol binge on driving ability in women are not influenced by binge frequency. However, high binge frequency may be associated with a less cautious approach to post‐binge driving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean expired breath alcohol levels, before and after behavioral testing, of the 30 participants (15 Low Frequency Bingers, 15 High Frequency Bingers) who received alcohol. * Significant difference pre- vs. post-testing within High Frequency Bingers, p < 0.05
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participants' responses to Visual Analog Scales administered after alcohol. Among Low Frequency but not High Frequency bingers, confidence in driving was significantly lower after alcohol than after placebo (*p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Driving errors after alcohol and placebo. Alcohol increased collisions (A) and centerline crossings (B) in both the High and Low Frequency groups (main effect of alcohol, p < 0.05).

References

    1. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) Manual. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2001.
    1. Beirness DJ. Self-estimates of blood alcohol concentration in drinking-driving context. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1987;19:79–90. - PubMed
    1. Brumback T, Cao D, King A. Effects of alcohol on psychomotor performance and perceived impairment in heavy binge social drinkers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91:10–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burian SE, Liguori A, Robinson HJ. Effects of alcohol on risk-taking during simulated driving. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp. 2002;17:141–150. - PubMed
    1. Chassin L, Pitts SC, Prost J. Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood in a high-risk sample: predictors and substance abuse outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:67–78. - PubMed

Publication types