[Relationship between dominance and richness of local species: an analysis of the underlying reasons with arboreal and avian communities of the West Caucasus as an example]

Abstract

Dominance level is traditionally expressed as a ratio between the number of individuals belonging to the most abundant species and the total number of individuals in a biological community. It is known that local species richness is usually higher in biological communities with high dominance level than in communities with low one. Taking into account a complex nature of the dominance phenomenon, the underlying reasons (or mechanisms) may be diverse: 1. Dominance level may be determined by bioecological traits of the most abundant species as well as stochastic impacts. The more abundant is dominant species, the fewer amount of resources goes to concomitant species and, therefore, the lower is community species richness. 2. The part of community resources used by the dominant species may be not a special case but can be a reflection of general pattern of resources distribution among species under specific environmental conditions. Correspondingly, in communities with higher dominance level there might be more "strict" distribution of resources among concomitant species, which, in turn, might influence community species richness. 3. The relationship between dominance level and community species richness may be caused by their dependence on the third variable, namely regional species pool. In the present paper we tackle the problem using arboreal and insectivorous bird communities of the West Caucasus as a case study. The data were collected in different altitudinal belts on both macroslopes of the western part of the Main Caucasian Ridge. The number of tree species and individual trees was counted within homogenous patches of arboreal phytocenoses 300 m2 in area. Species richness and numbers of insectivorous birds were estimated in course of route surveys with a route length being about 5 km. An analysis of empirical data was carried out using univariate and multiple correlation-regression techniques. The results indicate that the relationship between dominance and local species richness is determined to a large extent (by 50-60%) by a dominant taking over greater or lesser amount of the resources (mechanism 1). The role of two other mechanisms (2 and 3) is not so prominent--together, they are responsible for 25-40% of the relationship power. Relative contribution of different mechanisms to the relationship under consideration depends on conformity of species abundance rank structure with the geometric series model. At those sites where this conformity is manifested, the relationship between dominance level and species richness is due mainly to mechanisms 1 and 2, i.e., is determined by local processes. At other sites, where the conformity of species abundance rank structure with the geometric series model is not so good, a certain role belongs to the size of regional species pool (mechanism 3).