Renal parenchymal damage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy with one-stage tract dilation technique: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of one-stage vs gradual dilation techniques during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on postoperative renal scar formation and overall renal function.

Patients and methods: Of 152 adult patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 48 were randomized into two groups. In group 1 (n=19), gradual tract dilation with Alken metallic dilators was used, and in group 2 (n=29), one-stage tract dilation was used. We compared patient demographics, intraoperative and preoperative parameters, postoperative overall renal function, and renal scar formation on the target renal pole.

Results: Access time (P=0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.19-6.30) and radiation exposure during access (P=0.03; 95% CI: 0.03-0.66) were significantly shorter in group 2. In group 1, the decrease in mean technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (99m-Tc DMSA) uptake from 44.1±20.1% to 43.4±19.6% 4 weeks postoperatively (-0.7%±0.5%; P=0.27; 95% CI: -0.56-1.93) was not significant. In group 2, however, there was a significant decrease in post-PCNL 99m-Tc DMSA uptake 2 (-2.4±0.3%, from 50.1±13.5% to 47.7±13.8%; P=0.001; 95% CI: 1.13-3.66). Four weeks after surgery, new scar formation or progression of the preoperative scar at the site of access were seen in 14 of 29 (48.3%) patients who were treated with one-stage dilation whereas only 2 of 19 (11.0%) patients who were treated with gradual dilation developed new scarring at the access site (P=0.007).

Conclusion: Although the one-stage tract dilation technique reduced radiation exposure and access time, in the short term, it may cause more parenchymal damage than the gradual dilation technique.