Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;94(1):12-8.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.010314. Epub 2011 May 4.

Food reinforcement, energy intake, and macronutrient choice

Affiliations

Food reinforcement, energy intake, and macronutrient choice

Leonard H Epstein et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Food is a powerful reinforcer that motivates people to eat. The relative reinforcing value of food (RRV(food)) is associated with obesity and energy intake and interacts with impulsivity to predict energy intake.

Objective: How RRV(food) is related to macronutrient choice in ad libitum eating tasks in humans has not been studied; however, animal research suggests that sugar or simple carbohydrates may be a determinant of reward value in food. This study assessed which macronutrients are associated with food reinforcement.

Design: Two hundred seventy-three adults with various body mass indexes were assessed for RRV(food), the relative reinforcing value of reading, food hedonics, energy intake in an ad libitum taste test, and usual energy intake derived from repeated 24-h dietary recalls. Multiple regression was used to assess the relation between predictors of total energy and energy associated with macronutrient intake after control for age, sex, income, education, minority status, and other macronutrient intakes.

Results: The results showed that the relative proportion of responding for food compared with reading (RRV(prop)) was positively related to body mass index, laboratory-measured energy intake, and usual energy intake. In addition, RRV(prop) was a predictor of sugar intake but not of total carbohydrate, fat, or protein intake.

Conclusion: These results are consistent with basic animal research showing that sugar is related to food reward and with the hypothesis that food reward processes are more strongly related to eating than are food hedonics. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00962117.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Mean (±SEM) sugar energy intake by participants who were stratified by their responses to receive food or reading time (Pmax food/(Pmax food + Pmax reading): low preference for food (<0.2; n = 55), moderate preference for food (≥0.2 and <0.5; n = 95), or high preference for food (≥0.5; n = 123) relative to preference for reading. The relation between the relative reinforcing value of food compared with that of reading and sugar energy intake was P = 0.036 after control for age, sex, education, minority status, BMI, and energy intake from fat and protein. Pmax represents the breakpoint.

References

    1. Epstein LH, Leddy JJ, Temple JL, Faith MS. Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis. Psychol Bull 2007;133:884–906 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epstein LH, Temple JL, Neaderhiser BJ, Salis RJ, Erbe RW, Leddy JJ. Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype and energy intake in obese and non-obese humans. Behav Neurosci 2007;121:877–86 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Epstein LH, Wright SM, Paluch RA, et al. Food hedonics and reinforcement as determinants of laboratory food intake in smokers. Physiol Behav 2004;81:511–7 - PubMed
    1. Saelens BE, Epstein LH. The reinforcing value of food in obese and non-obese women. Appetite 1996;27:41–50 - PubMed
    1. Temple JL, Legierski CM, Giacomelli AM, Salvy SJ, Epstein LH. Overweight children find food more reinforcing and consume more energy than do nonoverweight children. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87:1121–7 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data