Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates
- PMID: 21543578
- PMCID: PMC3147866
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01253-10
Comparative evaluation of three commercial identification systems using common and rare bloodstream yeast isolates
Abstract
The commercial yeast identification systems API ID32C, Auxacolor, and Vitek were evaluated using 251 molecularly identified bloodstream isolates and 2 reference strains, representing a total of 35 species (6 common and 29 rare). Correct identification rates were higher for common species (Auxacolor, 95%; API ID32C, 94%; Vitek, 92%) than for rare species (Auxacolor, 43%; API ID32C, 56%; Vitek, 64%). All systems performed equally among the former, and Vitek performed best among the latter.
References
-
- Burton M. J., Shah P., Swiatlo E. 2011. Misidentification of Candida parapsilosis as Candida famata in a clinical case of vertebral osteomyelitis. Am. J. Med. Sci. 341:71–73 - PubMed
-
- Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2008. Interpretive criteria for identification of bacteria and fungi by DNA target sequencing: guideline. CLSI document MM18-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA
-
- Freydiere A. M., Guinet R., Boiron P. 2001. Yeast identification in the clinical microbiology laboratory: phenotypical methods. Med. Mycol. 39:9–33 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
