Semantic and pragmatic factors influencing deaf and hearing students' comprehension of english sentences containing numeral quantifiers
- PMID: 21543723
- DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enr013
Semantic and pragmatic factors influencing deaf and hearing students' comprehension of english sentences containing numeral quantifiers
Abstract
This research contrasted deaf and hearing students' interpretive knowledge of English sentences containing numeral quantifier phrases and indefinite noun phrases. A multiple-interpretation picture task methodology was used to assess 305 participants' judgments of the compatibility of sentence meanings with depicted discourse contexts. Participants' performance was assessed on the basis of hearing level (deaf, hearing) and grade level (middle school, high school, college). The deaf students were predicted to have differential access to specific sentence interpretations in accordance with the relative derivational complexity of the targeted sentence types. Hypotheses based on the pressures of derivational economy on acquisition were largely supported. The results also revealed that the deaf participants tended to overactivate pragmatic processes that yielded principled, though non-target, sentence interpretations. Collectively, the results not only contribute to the understanding of English acquisition under conditions of restricted access to spoken language input, they also suggest that pragmatic factors may play a broad role in influencing, and compromising, deaf students' reading comprehension and written expression.
Similar articles
-
Improving DHH students' grammar through an individualized software program.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Fall;16(4):437-57. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enr023. Epub 2011 Jul 6. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 21734228 Review.
-
Using miscue analysis to assess comprehension in deaf college readers.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Winter;16(1):35-46. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq017. Epub 2010 May 20. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 20488871
-
The relationship between reading achievement and morphological word analysis in deaf and hearing students matched for reading level.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004 Summer;9(3):269-85. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enh030. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2004. PMID: 15304431
-
Enhancing deaf students' learning from sign language and text: metacognition, modality, and the effectiveness of content scaffolding.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Winter;16(1):79-100. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq036. Epub 2010 Sep 1. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 20810467
-
The importance of morphemic awareness to reading achievement and the potential of signing morphemes to supporting reading development.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011 Summer;16(3):275-88. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enq063. Epub 2011 Jan 26. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2011. PMID: 21273191 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical