Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 May;13(5):357-65.
doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00432.x. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

Effectiveness and safety of valsartan in children aged 6 to 16 years with hypertension

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness and safety of valsartan in children aged 6 to 16 years with hypertension

Thomas Wells et al. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 May.

Abstract

The effectiveness and safety of valsartan have not been assessed in hypertensive children. Therefore, hypertensive patients aged 6 to 16 years (n=261) were randomized to receive weight-stratified low- (10/20 mg), medium- (40/80 mg), or high-dose (80/160 mg) valsartan for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, patients were randomized to a 2-week placebo-controlled withdrawal phase. Dose-dependent reductions in sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) were observed after 2 weeks (low dose, -7.9/-4.6 mm Hg; medium dose, -9.6/-5.8 mm Hg; high dose, -11.5/-7.4 mm Hg [P<.0001 for all groups]). During the withdrawal phase, SSBP and SDBP were both lower in the pooled valsartan group than in the pooled placebo group (SSBP, -2.7 mm Hg [P=.0368]; SDBP, -3.0 mm Hg [P=.0047]). Similar efficacy was observed in all subgroups. Valsartan was well tolerated and headache was the most commonly observed adverse event during both the double-blind and 52-week open-label phases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design: a placebo‐controlled washout preceded a 2‐week, randomized, dose‐ranging phase (phase 1), followed by a 2‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled, withdrawal phase (phase 2). Patients were then permitted to roll over into a 52‐week, open‐label extension phase to assess long‐term valsartan safety. Valsartan dosing began at 40 mg/d and could be increased every 2 weeks incrementally to 160 mg/d. Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg daily could be added if the blood pressure (BP) remained ≥95th percentile with the highest dose of valsartan (160 mg/d).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean changes in trough sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) in children (aged 6–16 years) randomized to receive 1 of 3 dose levels of valsartan (phase 1) for 2 weeks (low dose=10/20 mg; medium dose=40/80 mg; high dose=80/160 mg). The size of the circles is proportional to the number of patients in each group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Plot of the slope analysis for the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) from baseline to the end of phase 1 according to subgroup (intent‐to‐treat population). Estimates of the slope with 95% confidential intervals (CIs) are shown. (B) Plot of between‐group difference in the mean change in SSBP (mm Hg) from the end of phase 1 to the end of phase 2 for patients treated with valsartan. Data are presented according to subgroup. Estimates of the mean change difference with 95% CI are shown. The size of the circles is proportional to the number of patients in each group.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Changes in sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) from the end of phase 1 to the end of phase 2.

References

    1. Lurbe E. Hypertension and target organ damage in children and adolescents. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1998–2000. - PubMed
    1. Stabouli S, Kotsis V, Toumanidis S, et al. White‐coat and masked hypertension in children: association with target‐organ damage. Pediatr Nephrol. 2005;20:1151–1155. - PubMed
    1. Stabouli S, Kotsis V, Zakopoulos N. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and target organ damage in pediatrics. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1979–1986. - PubMed
    1. Verberk WJ, Thien T, de Leeuw PW. Masked hypertension, a review of the literature. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12:267–273. - PubMed
    1. Flynn JT. Pediatric hypertension: recent trends and accomplishments, future challenges. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:605–612. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms