The Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 1 Trial: an exploratory efficacy analysis
- PMID: 21546491
- PMCID: PMC3118599
- DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.610980
The Albumin in Acute Stroke Part 1 Trial: an exploratory efficacy analysis
Abstract
Background and purpose: The Albumin in Acute Stroke (ALIAS) Part 2 Trial is directly testing whether 2 g/kg of 25% human albumin (ALB) administered intravenously within 5 hours of ischemic stroke onset results in improved clinical outcome. Recruitment into Part 1 of the ALIAS Trial was halted for safety reasons. ALIAS Part 2 is a new, reformulated trial with more-stringent exclusion criteria. Our aim was to explore the efficacy of ALB in the ALIAS Part 1 data and to assess the statistical assumptions underlying the ALIAS Part 2 Trial.
Methods: ALIAS is a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Data on 434 subjects, comprising the ALIAS Part 1 subjects, were analyzed. We examined both the thrombolysis and nonthrombolysis cohorts combined and separately in a "target population" by excluding subjects who would not have been eligible for the ALIAS Part 2 Trial; the latter comprised patients >83 years of age, those with elevated baseline troponin values, and those with in-hospital stroke. We examined the differences in the primary composite outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 and/or a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days after randomization.
Results: In the combined thrombolysis plus nonthrombolysis cohorts of the target population, 44.7% of subjects in the ALB group had a favorable outcome compared with 36.0% in the saline group (absolute effect size=8.7%; 95% CI, -2.2% to 19.5%). Among thrombolyzed subjects of the target population, 46.7% had a favorable outcome in the ALB group compared with 36.6% in the saline group (absolute effect size=10.1%; 95% CI, -2.0% to 20.0%).
Conclusions: Preliminary results from the ALIAS Part 1 suggest a trend toward a favorable primary outcome in subjects treated with ALB and support the validity of the statistical assumptions that underlie the ALIAS Part 2 Trial. The ALIAS Part 2 Trial will confirm or refute these results.
Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ALIAS. Unique identifier: NCT00235495.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: None.
Figures
Comment in
-
Wisdom and determination in the ongoing pursuit of the ever-elusive neuroprotective agent.Stroke. 2011 Jun;42(6):1505-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.617761. Epub 2011 May 5. Stroke. 2011. PMID: 21546483 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hill MD, Moy CS, Palesch YY, Martin R, Dillon CR, Waldman BD, Patterson L, Mendez IM, Ryckborst KJ, Tamariz D, Ginsberg MD. The albumin in acute stroke trial (alias); design and methodology. Int J Stroke. 2007;2:214–219. - PubMed
-
- Palesch YY, Hill MD, Ryckborst KJ, Tamariz D, Ginsberg MD. The alias pilot trial: A dose-escalation and safety study of albumin therapy for acute ischemic stroke--ii: Neurologic outcome and efficacy analysis. Stroke. 2006;37:2107–2114. - PubMed
-
- Ginsberg MD, Hill MD, Palesch YY, Ryckborst KJ, Tamariz D. The alias pilot trial: A dose-escalation and safety study of albumin therapy for acute ischemic stroke--i: Physiological responses and safety results. Stroke. 2006;37:2100–2106. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
