Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;469(7):2042-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1904-0. Epub 2011 May 6.

Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons

Affiliations

Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons

Orrin I Franko. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The use of smartphones and their associated applications (apps) provides new opportunities for physicians, and specifically orthopaedic surgeons, to integrate technology into clinical practice.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was twofold: to review all apps specifically created for orthopaedic surgeons and to survey orthopaedic residents and surgeons in the United States to characterize the need for novel apps.

Methods: The five most popular smartphone app stores were searched for orthopaedic-related apps: Blackberry, iPhone, Android, Palm, and Windows. An Internet survey was sent to ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery departments to assess the level of smartphone use, app use, and desire for orthopaedic-related apps.

Results: The database search revealed that iPhone and Android platforms had apps specifically created for orthopaedic surgery with a total of 61 and 13 apps, respectively. Among the apps reviewed, only one had greater than 100 reviews (mean, 27), and the majority of apps had very few reviews, including AAOS Now and AO Surgery Reference, apps published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and AO Foundation, respectively. The national survey revealed that 84% of respondents (n = 476) have a smartphone, the majority (55%) have an iPhone, and that 53% of people with smartphones already use apps in clinical practice. Ninety-six percent of respondents who use apps reported they would like more orthopaedic apps and would pay an average of nearly $30 for useful apps. The four most requested categories of apps were textbook/reference, techniques/guides, OITE/board review, and billing/coding.

Conclusion: The use of smartphones and apps is prevalent among orthopaedic care providers in academic centers. However, few highly ranked apps specifically related to orthopaedic surgery are available, and the types of apps available do not appear to be the categories most desired by residents and surgeons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The distribution of smartphone platforms among respondents with a smartphone is shown.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The price survey is shown for amounts that respondents are willing to pay for a useful smartphone app. The utility of the app was defined by saving 5 to 10 minutes per day or 30 minutes per week.

Comment in

References

    1. Apple. iPhone App Store. 2010. Apple. Available at: http://www.apple.com/iphone/apps-for-iphone/#heroOverview. Accessed September 14, 2010.
    1. Archbold HA, Guha AR, Shyamsundar S, McBride SJ, Charlwood P, Wray R. The use of multi-media messaging in the referral of musculoskeletal limb injuries to a tertiary trauma unit using: a 1-month evaluation. Injury. 2005;36:560–566. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.08.027. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beredjiklian PK, Bozentka DJ, Steinberg DR, Bernstein J. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet: the case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1540–1543. - PubMed
    1. Boyer C, Selby M, Scherrer JR, Appel RD. The Health On the Net Code of Conduct for medical and health Websites. Comput Biol Med. 1998;28:603–610. doi: 10.1016/S0010-4825(98)00037-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burdette SD, Herchline TE, Oehler R. Surfing the web: practicing medicine in a technological age: using smartphones in clinical practice. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:117–122. doi: 10.1086/588788. - DOI - PubMed