Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 May 6;30(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-50.

Maintenance therapy in NSCLC: why? To whom? Which agent?

Affiliations
Review

Maintenance therapy in NSCLC: why? To whom? Which agent?

Silvia Novello et al. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Maintenance therapy is emerging as a treatment strategy in the management of advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Initial trials addressing the question of duration of combination chemotherapy failed to show any overall survival benefit for the prolonged administration over a fixed number of cycles with an increased risk for cumulative toxicity. Nowadays several agents with different ways of administration and a different pattern of toxicity have been formally investigated in the maintenance setting. Maintenance strategies include continuing with an agent already present in the induction regimen or switching to a different one. Taking into consideration that no comparative trials of maintenance with different chemotherapy drugs or targeted agents have been conducted, the choice and the duration of maintenance agents is largely empirical. Furthermore, it is still unknown and it remains an open question if this approach needs to be proposed to every patient in the case of partial/complete response or stable disease after the induction therapy. Here, we critically review available data on maintenance treatment, discussing the possibility to tailor the right treatment to the right patient, in an attempt to optimize costs and benefits of an ever-growing panel of different treatment options.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60 - PubMed
    1. Govindan R, Page N, Morgensztern D, Read W, Tierney R, Vlahiotis A, Spitznagel EL, Piccirillo J. Changing epidemiology of small cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years: analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic and end results database. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4539–4544. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.4859. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang P, Allen MS, Aubry MC, Wampfler JA, Marks RS, Edell ES, Thibodeau S, Adjei AA, Jett J, Deschamps C. Clinical features of 5,628 primary lung cancer patients: experience at Mayo Clinic from 1997 to 2003. Chest. 2005;128:452–462. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.1.452. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reck M, Von Pawel J, Zatloukal P, Ramlau R, Gorbounova V, Leighl N, J Mezger, Archer V, Moore N, Manegold C. Phase III trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine with either placebo or bevacizumab as first-line therapy for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: AVAIL. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1227–1234. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.5466. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandler A, Gray R, Perry MC, Brhamer J, Schiller JH, Dowlati A, Lilembaum R, Johnson DH. Paclitaxel-Carboplatin alone or with bevacizumab for non-small cell lung cancer. New England J Med. 2006;355:2542–2550. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061884. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances