Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 9:11:93.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-93.

A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons

Lee-Fay Low  1 , Melvyn Yap, Henry Brodaty
Affiliations

A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons

Lee-Fay Low et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Costs and consumer preference have led to a shift from the long-term institutional care of aged older people to home and community based care. The aim of this review is to evaluate the outcomes of case managed, integrated or consumer directed home and community care services for older persons, including those with dementia.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted of non-medical home and community care services for frail older persons. MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AgeLine, Scopus and PubMed were searched from 1994 to May 2009. Two researchers independently reviewed search results.

Results: Thirty five papers were included in this review. Evidence from randomized controlled trials showed that case management improves function and appropriate use of medications, increases use of community services and reduces nursing home admission. Evidence, mostly from non-randomized trials, showed that integrated care increases service use; randomized trials reported that integrated care does not improve clinical outcomes. The lowest quality evidence was for consumer directed care which appears to increase satisfaction with care and community service use but has little effect on clinical outcomes. Studies were heterogeneous in methodology and results were not consistent.

Conclusions: The outcomes of each model of care differ and correspond to the model's focus. Combining key elements of all three models may maximize outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Article selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gavrilov LA, Heuveline P. In: The Encyclopedia of Population. Demeny P, McNicoll G, editor. Vol. 1. New York: McMillan; 2006. Aging of Population; pp. 32–37.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Aged Care Statistics Series. Vol. 27. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008. Aged care packages in the community 2006-07: a statistical overview.
    1. Department of Work and Pensions. Opportunity for all: Indicators update 2007. London: Department of Work and Pensions, UK; 2007.
    1. Fine M. The fragmented structure of community support services: a community case study. Kensington: University of NSW Social Policy Research Centre; 1993.
    1. Clarfield AM, Bergman H, Kane R. Fragmentation of Care for Frail Older People; an International Problem. Experience from Three Countries: Israel, Canada, and the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(12):1714–1721. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49285.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms