Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 21552384
- PMCID: PMC3088863
- DOI: 10.7150/jca.2.232
Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is currently inadequate. The aim of this comprehensive review was to identify important molecular biological markers associated with DCIS and candidate markers associated with increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence after diagnosis of DCIS. A comprehensive systematic review was performed to identify studies published in the past 10 years that investigated biological markers in DCIS. To be included in this review, studies that investigated the rate of biological expression of markers had to report on at least 30 patients; studies that analyzed the recurrence risk associated with biomarker expression had to report on at least 50 patients. There were 6,252 patients altogether in our review. Biological markers evaluated included steroid receptors, proliferation markers, cell cycle regulation and apoptotic markers, angiogenesis-related proteins, epidermal growth factor receptor family receptors, extracellular matrix-related proteins, and COX-2. Although the studies in this review provide valuable preliminary information regarding the expression and prognostic significance of biomarkers in DCIS, common limitations of published studies (case-series, cohort, and case-control studies) were that they were limited to small patient cohorts in which the extent of surgery and use of radiotherapy or endocrine therapy varied from patient to patient, and variable methods of determining biomarker expression. These constraints made it difficult to interpret the absolute effect of expression of various biomarkers on risk of local recurrence. No prospective validation studies were identified. As the study of biomarkers are in their relative infancy in DCIS compared with invasive breast cancer, key significant prognostic and predictive markers associated with invasive breast cancer have not been adequately studied in DCIS. There is a critical need for prospective analyses of novel and other known breast cancer molecular markers in large cohorts of patient with DCIS to differentiate indolent from aggressive DCIS and better tailor the need and extent of current therapies.
Keywords: Biological Markers; Breast Recurrence; DCIS; Ductal carcinoma in situ.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Similar articles
-
The prognostic role of HER2 expression in ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS); a population-based cohort study.BMC Cancer. 2015 Jun 11;15:468. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1479-3. BMC Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26062614 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery between ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Apr 27;14:126. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0885-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27122132 Free PMC article.
-
Carcinoma in situ of the female breast. A clinico-pathological, immunohistological, and DNA ploidy study.APMIS Suppl. 2003;(108):1-67. APMIS Suppl. 2003. PMID: 12874968 Review.
-
Stromal architecture and periductal decorin are potential prognostic markers for ipsilateral locoregional recurrence in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.Histopathology. 2013 Oct;63(4):520-33. doi: 10.1111/his.12188. Epub 2013 Jul 26. Histopathology. 2013. PMID: 23889174
-
Prognostic and predictive molecular markers in DCIS: a review.Adv Anat Pathol. 2005 Sep;12(5):256-64. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000184177.65919.5e. Adv Anat Pathol. 2005. PMID: 16210921 Review.
Cited by
-
Correlation of histopathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with the oncotype DX DCIS score.Mod Pathol. 2015 Sep;28(9):1167-73. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.79. Epub 2015 Jun 26. Mod Pathol. 2015. PMID: 26111975
-
Tailoring treatment for ductal intraepithelial neoplasia of the breast according to Ki-67 and molecular phenotype.Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 30;108(8):1593-601. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.147. Epub 2013 Apr 11. Br J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23579208 Free PMC article.
-
Methylation profiling of ductal carcinoma in situ and its relationship to histopathological features.Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Oct 21;16(5):423. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0423-9. Breast Cancer Res. 2014. PMID: 25331261 Free PMC article.
-
Variation in detection of ductal carcinoma in situ during screening mammography: a survey within the International Cancer Screening Network.Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):185-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 13. Eur J Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24041876 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic role of HER2 expression in ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS); a population-based cohort study.BMC Cancer. 2015 Jun 11;15:468. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1479-3. BMC Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26062614 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kuerer HM. Rational individualised selection of adjuvant therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Lancet Oncol. 2010;12:2–3. - PubMed
-
- Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P. et al. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference statement: Diagnosis and Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ September 22-24, 2009. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:161–9. - PubMed
-
- Barker PE. Cancer biomarker validation: standards and process: roles for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;983:142–50. - PubMed
-
- Ludwig JA, Weinstein JN. Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:845–56. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous