Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May-Jun;126(3):394-9.
doi: 10.1177/003335491112600313.

Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: a qualitative examination from the payer perspective

Emily F Shortridge  1 , Jonathan R Moore, Heidi Whitmore, Michael J O'Grady, Angela K Shen
Affiliations

Policy implications of first-dollar coverage: a qualitative examination from the payer perspective

Emily F Shortridge et al. Public Health Rep. 2011 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Immunization against potentially life-threatening illnesses for children and adults has proved to be one of the great public health successes of the 20th century and is extremely cost-effective. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act includes a number of provisions to increase coverage and access to immunizations for the consumer, including a provision for health plans to cover all Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices-recommended vaccines at first dollar, or without cost sharing. In this study, we examined payers' perspectives on first-dollar coverage of vaccines and strategies to improve vaccination rates.

Methods: This was a qualitative study, using a literature review and semistructured expert interviews with payers.

Results: Four key themes emerged, including (1) the cost implications of the first-dollar change; (2) the importance of examining barriers to children, adolescents, and adults separately to focus interventions more strategically; (3) the importance of provider knowledge and education in increasing immunization; and (4) the effect of first-dollar coverage on those who decline vaccination for personal reasons.

Conclusions: We determined that, while reducing financial barriers through first-dollar coverage is an important first step to increasing immunization rates, there are structural and cultural barriers that also will require collaborative, strategic work among all vaccine stakeholders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Freed GL, Bordley WC, DeFriese GH. Childhood immunization programs: an analysis of policy issues. Milbank Q. 1993;71:65–96. - PubMed
    1. Institutes of Medicine, Committee on the Evaluation of Vaccine Purchase Financing in the United States. Financing vaccines in the 21st century: assuring access and availability. Washington: National Academies Press; 2003. - PubMed
    1. Stokley S, Dorell C, Yankey D. National, state, and local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years—United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58(36):997–1001. - PubMed
    1. Institutes of Medicine, Committee on Immunization Finance Policies and Practices. Calling the shots: immunization finance policies and practices. Washington: National Academies Press; 2000. - PubMed
    1. Paschal AM, Maryman J, Oler-Manske J. How can immunization coverage in urban counties be improved? A pilot study of a Kansas county. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37:423–5. - PubMed