Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
- PMID: 21554526
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10342.x
Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)
Abstract
Objectives: • To investigate the Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) procedure, a novel, minimally invasive treatment for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), which aims to mechanically open the prostatic urethra without ablation or resection. • To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of this procedure and to make an initial assessment of effectiveness.
Patients and methods: • The PULprocedure was performed on 19 men in Australia. • Small suture-based implants were implanted transurethrally under cystoscopic visualisation to separate encroaching lateral prostatic lobes. • Patients were evaluated at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after PUL.
Results: • All cases were successfully completed with no serious or unexpected adverse events (AEs). • Between two and five sutures were delivered in each patient and the prostatic urethral lumen was visually increased in all patients. • Reported postoperative AEs were typically mild and transient and included dysuria and haematuria. • Follow-up cystoscopy at 6 months in a subset of patients showed no calcification. Histological findings from two of three patients who progressed to transurethral resection of the prostate for return of symptoms showed no evidence of inflammation related to the implanted materials. • The mean International Prostate Symptom Score was reduced by 37% at 2 weeks and 39% at 1 year after PUL as compared with baseline.
Conclusions: • We demonstrated in this initial experience that the PUL procedure is safe and feasible. • The safety profile of the PUL procedure appears favourable; most patients reported sustained symptom relief to 12 months with minimal morbidity • PUL therefore warrants further study as a new option for the many patients who seek an alternative to current therapies.
© 2011 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2011 BJU INTERNATIONAL.
Comment in
-
BPH: Lift and separate to relieve LUTS.Nat Rev Urol. 2011 Jun 14;8(7):352. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2011.88. Nat Rev Urol. 2011. PMID: 21670754 No abstract available.
-
Words of wisdom. Re: Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Eur Urol. 2011 Nov;60(5):1120-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.033. Eur Urol. 2011. PMID: 21961740 No abstract available.
-
Re: Safety and feasibility of the prostatic urethral lift: a novel, minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).J Urol. 2012 Apr;187(4):1360. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.039. Epub 2012 Feb 15. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22423934 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prostatic urethral lift: two-year results after treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.021. Urology. 2012. PMID: 22202539
-
Multicentre prospective crossover study of the 'prostatic urethral lift' for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):615-22. doi: 10.1111/bju.12540. BJU Int. 2014. PMID: 24765680 Clinical Trial.
-
Minimally invasive prostatic urethral lift: surgical technique and multinational experience.Eur Urol. 2013 Aug;64(2):292-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Jan 19. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23357348
-
Prostatic urethral lift: a novel approach for managing symptomatic BPH in the aging man.Can J Urol. 2015 Oct;22 Suppl 1:67-74. Can J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26497346 Review.
-
Prostatic Urethral Lift: A Unique Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Urol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;43(3):357-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.008. Urol Clin North Am. 2016. PMID: 27476128 Review.
Cited by
-
Urethral lift for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comprehensive review of the literature.Curr Urol Rep. 2013 Dec;14(6):620-7. doi: 10.1007/s11934-013-0348-3. Curr Urol Rep. 2013. PMID: 23794125 Review.
-
Minimally invasive prostatic urethral lift (PUL) efficacious in TURP candidates: a multicenter German evaluation after 2 years.World J Urol. 2019 Jul;37(7):1353-1360. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2494-1. Epub 2018 Oct 3. World J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30283994 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of six therapies for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Dec 29;10:29-43. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S148195. eCollection 2018. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017. PMID: 29343977 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Ther Adv Urol. 2012 Apr;4(2):77-83. doi: 10.1177/1756287212437361. Ther Adv Urol. 2012. PMID: 22496710 Free PMC article.
-
[Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].Urologe A. 2016 Nov;55(11):1419-1432. doi: 10.1007/s00120-016-0249-4. Urologe A. 2016. PMID: 27761589 Review. German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical