Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Mar;8(3):830-41.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph8030830. Epub 2011 Mar 11.

Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk

Robin Lee  1 , Samantha Lampert, Lynn Wilder, Anne L Sowell
Affiliations

Subjects agree to participate in environmental health studies without fully comprehending the associated risk

Robin Lee et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Recent advances in environmental health research have greatly improved our ability to measure and quantify how individuals are exposed. These advances, however, bring bioethical uncertainties and potential risks that individuals should be aware of before consenting to participate. This study assessed how well participants from two environmental health studies comprehended consent form material. After signing the consent form, participants were asked to complete a comprehension assessment tool. The tool measured whether participants could recognize or recall six elements of the consent form they had just reviewed. Additional data were collected to look for differences in comprehension by gender, age, race, and the time spent reading the original consent form. Seventy-three participants completed a comprehension assessment tool. Scores ranged from 1.91 to 6.00 (mean = 4.66); only three people had perfect comprehension scores. Among the least comprehended material were questions on study-related risks. Overall, 53% of participants were not aware of two or more study-related risks. As environmental public health studies pose uncertainties and potential risks, researchers need to do more to assess participants' understanding before assuming that individuals have given their 'informed' consent.

Keywords: bioethics; comprehension; consent forms; environmental health; ethics; informed consent; research subjects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. National Research Council . Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. National Academies Press; Washington, DC, USA: 2006. pp. 17–21.
    1. Brody JG, Morello-Frosch R, Brown P, Rudel RA, Altman RG, Frye M, Osimo CA, Perez C, Seryak LM. Improving disclosure and consent: “is it safe?”: New ethics for reporting personal exposures to environmental chemicals. Amer. J. Public Health. 2007;97:1547–1554. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silver K, Sharp RR. Ethical considerations in testing workers for the -Glu69 marker of genetic susceptibility to chronic beryllium disease. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006;48:434–443. - PubMed
    1. Harrison M. Applying bioethical principles to human biomonitoring. Environ Health. 2008;7(Suppl 1):S1–S8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research. Government Printing Office; Washington, DC, USA: 1978. p. 3 v.