Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;100(1):41-6.
doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0019-0. Epub 2011 May 10.

The characterization of dentin defects produced by air polishing

Affiliations

The characterization of dentin defects produced by air polishing

Kazuhiro Tada et al. Odontology. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to characterize the defects in the dentin surface after air polishing for three types of polishing powders and five different nozzle distances. Human teeth were embedded in acrylic resin and then polished until the dentin surface became exposed. The nozzle of the polisher was fixed at a specified distance (2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 mm) and orientation (45°) with respect to the dentin surface. The three powders were CLASSIC (NaHCO(3), 65 μm diameter), PERIO (glycine, 25 μm diameter), and SOFT (glycine, 65 μm diameter). With respect to nozzle distance, we find a significant difference in the mean defect depth only at 6 mm. The spray distance of 6 mm produced the shallowest defect depths. This variable had no effect on the defect volume. SOFT powder had significantly less depths and volumes of defects than the other two powders. The contact angle of the dentin increased significantly in all polishing tests, compared to an unpolished dentin surface (control). We find that spray distance of 6 mm from the nozzle of the polisher and orienting on 45° angle produced less dentin surface defects than any other distance in all powder systems used. At this distance, SOFT powder produced statistically significant smaller depth and volume defects than the other two powder groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Periodontol. 1991 Mar;18(3):182-9 - PubMed
    1. Int Dent J. 1993 Jun;43(3):223-38 - PubMed
    1. Odontology. 2010 Feb;98(1):31-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Periodontol. 1987 May;14(5):300-4 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Feb;30(2):165-70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources