Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2011 Jun;121(6):1252-60.
doi: 10.1002/lary.21780. Epub 2011 May 6.

Prospective multi-arm evaluation of surgical treatments for vocal fold scar and pathologic sulcus vocalis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Prospective multi-arm evaluation of surgical treatments for vocal fold scar and pathologic sulcus vocalis

Nathan V Welham et al. Laryngoscope. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of type I thyroplasty, injection laryngoplasty, and graft implantation for the treatment of vocal fold scar and pathologic sulcus vocalis.

Study design: Prospective, multi-arm, quasi-experimental research design.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients with newly diagnosed vocal fold scar and/or pathologic sulcus vocalis were assigned to one of three treatment modalities: type I thyroplasty (n = 9), injection laryngoplasty (n = 9), and graft implantation (n = 10). Psychosocial, auditory-perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and videostroboscopic data were collected pretreatment and at 1, 6, 12, and 18 months posttreatment.

Results: Type I thyroplasty and graft implantation both resulted in reduced voice handicap with no concomitant improvement in auditory-perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, or vocal fold physiologic performance. Injection laryngoplasty resulted in no improvement on any vocal function index. Patients who underwent graft implantation exhibited the slowest improvement trajectory across the 18-month follow-up period.

Conclusions: A persistent challenge in this area is that no single treatment modality is successful for the majority of patients, and there is no evidence-based decision algorithm for matching a given treatment to a given patient. Progress therefore requires the identification and categorization of predictive clinical features that can drive evidence-based treatment assignment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors hold no financial or other conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative clinical cases illustrating negative and positive outcomes following treatment for vocal fold scarring and pathologic sulcus vocalis. Panel A contains vocal function data collected from a 58-year-old male patient with right-sided Type III sulcus vocalis treated with an acellular dermal matrix graft. This patient demonstrated improved pitch range and no change/deterioration on all other indices. Videostroboscopic closure pattern was spindle-shaped on both pre-treatment and all post-treatment examinations. Panel B contains vocal function data collected from a 78-year-old male patient with right-sided vocal fold scar and left-sided Type II sulcus vergeture treated with bilateral calcium hydroxyapatite injections. This patient demonstrated improvement on all indices except mucosal wave excursion. Videostroboscopic closure pattern was spindle-shaped on both pre-treatment and all post-treatment examinations. Vocal function data are graphed as pre-treatment baseline value, mean post-treatment value across an 18 month period, and best post-treatment value at any time point within this 18 month period. B, bilateral; D2, correlation dimension; Dx, diagnosis; L, left; Pth, phonation threshold pressure; R, right; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; ST, semitone; Tx, treatment; VHI-T, voice handicap index total score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the number of vocal function indices showing mean post-treatment improvement, no change or deterioration following type I thyroplasty (A; n = 9), injection laryngoplasty (B; n = 9) and graft implantation (C; n = 10) treatments for vocal fold scarring and pathologic sulcus vocalis. Data are presented by individual patient on the left; key diagnostic information for each patient is presented on the right. Mean post-treatment change reflects an 18 month follow-up period. L-VF, left vocal fold; R-VF, right vocal fold.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Group analysis of outcomes following type I thyroplasty (n = 9), injection laryngoplasty (n = 9) and graft implantation (n = 10) treatments for vocal fold scarring and pathologic sulcus vocalis. Vocal function data are graphed as pre-treatment baseline value, mean post-treatment value across an 18 month period, and best post-treatment value at any time point within this 18 month period. D2, correlation dimension; Pth, phonation threshold pressure; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; ST, semitone; VHI-T, voice handicap index total score.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Duration to best post-treatment value following type I thyroplasty (n = 9), injection laryngoplasty (n = 9) and graft implantation (n = 10) treatments for vocal fold scarring and pathologic sulcus vocalis. Best post-treatment value reflects an 18 month follow-up period. Data are presented as cumulative percentage of total patient number within each treatment group. D2, correlation dimension; Pth, phonation threshold pressure; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; VHI-T, voice handicap index total score.

References

    1. Hirano S, Minamiguchi S, Yamashita M, Ohno T, Kanemaru S, Kitamura M. Histologic characterization of human scarred vocal folds. J Voice. 2009;23:399–407. - PubMed
    1. Thibeault SL, Gray SD, Bless DM, Chan RW, Ford CN. Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring. J Voice. 2002;16:96–104. - PubMed
    1. Rousseau B, Hirano S, Scheidt TD, et al. Characterization of vocal fold scarring in a canine model. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:620–627. - PubMed
    1. Welham NV, Montequin DW, Tateya I, Tateya T, Choi SH, Bless DM. A rat excised larynx model of vocal fold scar. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52:1008–1020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirano M, Yoshida T, Tanaka S, Hibi S. Sulcus vocalis: functional aspects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1990;99:679–683. - PubMed

Substances