Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1001027.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001027. Epub 2011 Apr 26.

Neglect of medical evidence of torture in Guantánamo Bay: a case series

Vincent Iacopino  1 , Stephen N Xenakis
Affiliations

Neglect of medical evidence of torture in Guantánamo Bay: a case series

Vincent Iacopino et al. PLoS Med. 2011 Apr.

Abstract

Background: In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the US, the government authorized the use of "enhanced interrogation" techniques that were previously recognized as torture. While the complicity of US health professionals in the design and implementation of US torture practices has been documented, little is known about the role of health providers, assigned to the US Department of Defense (DoD) at the US Naval Station Guantánamo Bay, Cuba (GTMO), who should have been in a position to observe and document physical and psychological evidence of torture and ill treatment.

Methods and findings: We reviewed GTMO medical records and relevant case files (client affidavits, attorney-client notes and summaries, and legal affidavits of medical experts) of nine individuals for evidence of torture and ill treatment and documentation by medical personnel. In each of the nine cases, GTMO detainees alleged abusive interrogation methods that are consistent with torture as defined by the UN Convention Against Torture as well as the more restrictive US definition of torture that was operational at the time. The medical affidavits in each of the nine cases indicate that the specific allegations of torture and ill treatment are highly consistent with physical and psychological evidence documented in the medical records and evaluations by non-governmental medical experts. However, the medical personnel who treated the detainees at GTMO failed to inquire and/or document causes of the physical injuries and psychological symptoms they observed. Psychological symptoms were commonly attributed to "personality disorders" and "routine stressors of confinement." Temporary psychotic symptoms and hallucinations did not prompt consideration of abusive treatment. Psychological assessments conducted by non-governmental medical experts revealed diagnostic criteria for current major depression and/or PTSD in all nine cases.

Conclusion: The findings in these nine cases from GTMO indicate that medical doctors and mental health personnel assigned to the DoD neglected and/or concealed medical evidence of intentional harm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

VI states that he is employed by Physicians for Human Rights and has served as a medical expert in eight of the nine GTMO cases. SNX states that he has served as an expert witness, volunteer consultant to Physicians for Human Rights, and participant in activities sponsored by Human Rights First.

Comment in

References

    1. UN. UN Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 1984. General assembly res. 39/46. Annex, 39 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 51) at 197, UN Doc. A/39/51. Entered into force 26 June 1987. Available: http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu2/6/cat/treaties/opcat.htm. Accessed 4 March 2011. - PubMed
    1. International Committee of the Red Cross. The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols. 2011. Available: http://www.icrc.org/eng/war-and-law/treaties-customary-law/geneva-conven.... Accessed 4 March 2011.
    1. Allen S, Chaffee D, Hashemian F. Cambridge (MA): Physicians for Human Rights; and New York (NY): Human Rights First; 2007. Leave No Marks: Enhanced Interrogation Techniques and the Risk of Criminality. Available: http://physiciansforhumanrights.org/library/documents/reports/leave-no-m.... Accessed 4 March 2011.
    1. Human Rights Watch. New York (NY): Human Rights Watch; March 2004. “Enduring Freedom” Appendix: US Criticisms of Mistreatment and Torture Practices. Available: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/afghanistan0304/7.htm. Accessed 4 March 2011.
    1. Committee on Armed Services, US Senate. Inquiry into the Treatment of Detainees. 2008. Report of the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate. Available: http://armed-services.senate.gov/Publications/Detainee%20Report%20Final_.... Accessed 4 March 2011.

MeSH terms