Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;98(8):1171-8.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.7518. Epub 2011 May 10.

Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery

Y Hashiguchi  1 , K Hase, H Ueno, H Mochizuki, E Shinto, J Yamamoto
Affiliations

Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery

Y Hashiguchi et al. Br J Surg. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: A standard management policy has not yet been established with respect to the extent of lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer.

Methods: A total of 914 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative surgery for T2-T4 colonic cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and the potential contributions to the staging accuracy of the distinct area were analysed. The survival benefit of dissection was compared for pericolic (local), mesocolic (intermediate) and main arterial trunk (main) LN.

Results: Removal of the pericolic LNs within 5 cm of the tumour and intermediate LNs resulted in a mean LN number of 15.9, a sensitivity for overall node positivity of 97.5 per cent, and a survival benefit calculated as a therapeutic value index of 31.4 points. The additional removal of LNs more than 5 cm from the tumour and main LNs did not improve the staging accuracy, while adding only 3.4 points to the survival benefit.

Conclusion: Current guidelines may encourage needlessly extensive surgery. Clinical trials to establish the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in