Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Aug;13(8):813-8.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2011.0049. Epub 2011 May 11.

The contribution of glucose variability to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations

The contribution of glucose variability to asymptomatic hypoglycemia in persons with type 2 diabetes

Louis Monnier et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Background: The present study was designed to define the relative contributions of glucose variability and ambient glycemia to the incidence of asymptomatic hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Two hundred twenty-two persons with type 2 diabetes were divided into three groups: Group I (n = 53) on insulin sensitizers alone, Group II (n = 87) on oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) to include at least one insulin secretagogue, and Group III (n = 82) on insulin alone or in combination with OHAs. Ambient mean glucose concentration (MG) values (in mmol/L) and glycemic variability (SD around the mean glucose value) (in mmol/L) or mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (in mmol/L) were assessed by a continuous glucose monitoring system. Asymptomatic hypoglycemia was recorded over a 48-h period. Poisson regression analysis was used for assessing the potential predictors of hypoglycaemia.

Results: The best model fit was obtained with the two following explanatory variables: MG and SD. Hypoglycemia frequency was negatively associated with MG and positively with SD: Log (number of hypoglycemia episodes) = 1.37 - (0.72 × MG) + (1.33 × SD). Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for hypoglycemic risk were significantly different from 1 for MG at 0.96 (0.95-0.97) (P < 0.0001) and for SD at 1.08 (1.06-1.10) (P < 0.0001). In addition, the risk for hypoglycemia was completely or virtually eliminated when the SD was <1.7 mmol/L irrespective of the ambient glucose level and treatment modality.

Conclusions: As the risk of asymptomatic hypoglycemia increases in the presence of increased glucose variability, avoidance of excess glucose fluctuations should be an important consideration for either reducing or preventing the risk of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types