Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot
- PMID: 21561880
- PMCID: PMC3230830
- DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.236430
Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot
Abstract
Objectives: To compare performance measures across all three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening faecal occult blood test pilot and their relation to social deprivation and ethnicity.
Methods: In each round in three primary care trusts, data for a restricted population of over 48,500 aged 60-69 years were analysed. Individual-based data included postcode linked to area-based data on the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2004, and ethnicity. Outcomes were the rates of screening and colonoscopy uptake, positivity and detection of neoplasia (adenomas or bowel cancer) and bowel cancer, and the positive predictive values (PPVs) of a positive test for neoplasia and bowel cancer. Sensitivity was calculated by the proportional incidence method using data on interval cancers identified from cancer registrations.
Results: The overall uptake rate was 61.8%, 57.0% and 58.7% in the first, second and third rounds, respectively. Although the PPV for cancer decreased over the course of the three rounds (10.9% in the 1st round, 6.5% in 3rd round), the PPV for all neoplasia remained relatively constant (42.6% in 1st round, 36.9% in 3rd round). Deprivation and non-white ethnic background (principally Indian subcontinent in the pilot region) were associated with low screening and colonoscopy uptake rates, and this changed little over the three screening rounds. Uptake was lower in men, although differences in uptake between men and women decreased over time. Non-participation in previous rounds was a strong predictor of low uptake.
Conclusions: Performance measures are commensurate with expectations in a screening programme reaching its third round of screening, but a substantial ongoing effort is needed, particularly to address the effects of deprivation and ethnicity in relation to uptake.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Sustained participation, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma detection rates over two rounds of the Tallaght-Trinity College colorectal cancer screening programme with the faecal immunological test.Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;26(12):1415-21. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000207. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014. PMID: 25244415
-
Colorectal cancer screening uptake over three biennial invitation rounds in the English bowel cancer screening programme.Gut. 2015 Feb;64(2):282-91. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306144. Epub 2014 May 7. Gut. 2015. PMID: 24812001 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests.Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1439-46. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843. Epub 2011 Dec 7. Gut. 2012. PMID: 22156981 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;4(8):622-631. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30176-1. Epub 2019 Jun 10. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31196734
-
Declining Bowel Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Germany.Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Feb 19;113(7):101-6. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0101. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016. PMID: 26940777 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gender differences in stage at diagnosis and preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 14;20(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07195-4. BMC Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32795358 Free PMC article.
-
Intention to have blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) screening among men and women aged 50-77 years from Black and Asian backgrounds: a cross-sectional survey in Great Britain.BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 13;3(2):e002341. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002341. eCollection 2025. BMJ Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40661256 Free PMC article.
-
Approaching the Hard-to-Reach in Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening: an Overview of Individual, Provider and System Level Coping Strategies.AIMS Public Health. 2017 Jun 22;4(3):289-300. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.3.289. eCollection 2017. AIMS Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29546218 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of a service intervention to improve awareness and uptake of bowel cancer screening in ethnically-diverse areas.Br J Cancer. 2014 Sep 23;111(7):1440-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.363. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Br J Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24983374 Free PMC article.
-
Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women.Br J Cancer. 2015 Apr 28;112(9):1562-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.69. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Br J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25742470 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Steele RJC, McClements PL, Libby G, et al. Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBt screening for colorectal cancer. Gut 2009;58:530–5 - PubMed
-
- Weller D, Alexander F, Orbell S, et al. Evaluation of the UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot. A Report for the UK Department of Health, 2003. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/pilot.html
-
- Weller D, Moss S, Butler P, et al. English Pilot of Bowel Cancer Screening: an Evaluation of the Second Round. 2006. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/pilot.html
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources