Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair
- PMID: 21562913
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1440-1
Shrinkage and biomechanical evaluation of lightweight synthetics in a rabbit model for primary fascial repair
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: The experiment evaluated different lightweights (<32 g/m(2)) in terms of shrinkage and biomechanics.
Methods: PP-8 (polypropylene of 7.6 g/m(2)), PP-s (PP-8 with absorbable sheets), PP-32 (PP with absorbable fibers; 32.0 g/m(2)) and polyvinylidinefluoride (PVDF; 24.9 g/m(2)) augmented primary sutured repairs of the anterior abdominal wall in a total of 40 rabbits. Rabbits were implanted by only one type of mesh at four abdominal sites. After 7, 14, 30, 60 and 120 days, 2 rabbits were sacrificed per group. Three additional unoperated rabbits were used as controls. Shrinkage and uni-axial tensiometry were evaluated.
Results: PP-s implants wrinkled in 70%. PP-32 did not shrink whereas PP-8 and PVDF shrank by 20%. Explants were as strong as the controls; however, they differed in compliance. At lower stress, the tested materials were equally stiff.
Conclusions: The biomechanical behaviour of the tested lightweights does not mimic that of native controls. Weight reduction does not prevent shrinkage.
Similar articles
-
Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model.Surg Endosc. 2009 Feb;23(2):327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9923-y. Epub 2008 Apr 25. Surg Endosc. 2009. PMID: 18437474
-
In vivo studies comparing the biocompatibility of various polypropylene meshes and their handling properties during endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) patchplasty: an experimental study in pigs.Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):211-20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8113-1. Epub 2003 Dec 29. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14691711
-
Short-term behavior of different polymer structure lightweight meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects.Histol Histopathol. 2013 May;28(5):611-21. doi: 10.14670/HH-28.611. Epub 2013 Feb 6. Histol Histopathol. 2013. PMID: 23386547
-
Evaluation of the histological and biomechanical properties of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold for pelvic organ prolapse, compared with polypropylene mesh in a rabbit model.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Aug;33(8):2213-2220. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04851-6. Epub 2021 Jun 14. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 34125243
-
The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair.Surg Innov. 2005 Mar;12(1):63-9. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200109. Surg Innov. 2005. PMID: 15846448 Review.
Cited by
-
On the relevance of uniaxial tensile testing of urogynecological prostheses: the effect of displacement rate.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Jan;24(1):161-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1815-y. Epub 2012 May 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22584925
-
Biomechanical effects of polyglecaprone fibers in a polypropylene mesh after abdominal and rectovaginal implantation in a rabbit.Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Oct;23(10):1397-402. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1739-6. Epub 2012 Apr 19. Int Urogynecol J. 2012. PMID: 22527542
-
Influence of reproductive status on tissue composition and biomechanical properties of ovine vagina.PLoS One. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e93172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093172. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24709913 Free PMC article.
-
Lower exposure rates of partially absorbable mesh compared to nonabsorbable mesh for cystocele treatment: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.Int Urogynecol J. 2013 May;24(5):749-58. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1929-2. Epub 2012 Aug 29. Int Urogynecol J. 2013. PMID: 22930216 Clinical Trial.
-
Intraluminal mesh migration causing enteroenteric and enterocutaneous fistula: a case and discussion of the 'mesh problem'.BMJ Case Rep. 2018 Apr 17;2018:bcr2017223476. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-223476. BMJ Case Rep. 2018. PMID: 29666083 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous