Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Oct;90(10):1057-69.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01178.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth

Affiliations
Review

Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth

Miha Lucovnik et al. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

Progestin supplementation appears to be a promising approach to both preventing initiation of preterm labor and treating it once it is already established, given the role of progesterone in maintaining pregnancy, as well as support from basic and clinical research. Progesterone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone acetate slow the process of cervical ripening, and this is the rationale for prophylactic long-term progestin supplementation mostly studied so far. However, progesterone (but not 17α-hydroxyprogesterone acetate) also inhibits myometrial activity even after the cervix has already ripened. Moreover, these effects depend greatly on the vehicle used and the route of administration. Understanding different mechanisms of action, as well as the importance of progestin formulation, vehicle and route of administration, is the key to finding the optimal progestin treatment for prevention of preterm birth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bar graphs showing means ± SD of cervical light-induced fluorescence (LIF) obtained in vivo from pregnant rats at different days of pregnancy and postpartum treated with progesterone (P4), 17-OH P, or vehicle. A) Daily treatment with vehicle (controls) or P4 (4 mg, s.c.). Note that delivery is inhibited in the treatment group. B) Treatment daily with vehicle (controls) or 17-OH P (10 mg, s.c.). Note that significant differences are only observed until day 19 of gestation. From Kuon et. al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:455 e1–9.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Treatment with onapristone (ZK-98299) on day 16 of pregnancy induces preterm delivery and an increase the EMG PS Peak frequency in rats. From modification of figures in Shi et. al. Am J. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:235 e1–235.e4.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effects of progesterone (P4) (top 3 traces) and 17-OH P (traces 4 to 6 from top) on myometrial contractility. KCl was added to the baths just prior to termination of the experiment. Note the inhibition of myometrial contractility with P4, but not with 17-OH P. From Ruddock et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:391.e1–391.e7.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Shown is the time of delivery (= hours after 8 a.m. of day 22 of gestation) of pregnant rats treated with vehicles (controls) and progestins by different routes of administration – injections (s.c.; daily): vehicle: sesame oil; progesterone (P4) (4 mg); 17-OH P (10 mg); vaginal (bid): vehicle: Replens®; P4 (15 mg, Crinone®); oral (bid): vehicle: sesame oil or H2O; P4 (15 mg); transdermal (bid): vehicle: Replens® or fish oil; P4 (15 mg). Rats with delayed parturition were sacrificed on day 25. Asterisks indicate P <0.05 compared with controls. From Kuon et. al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:455 e1–9.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Plasma progesterone (P4) levels in pregnant rats on day 18 and 21 without any treatment (controls) and on day 21 after treatment from day 18 until delivery with vaginal P4 (15 mg, bid), s.c. injections of P4 (4 mg), topical P4 in fish oil (15 mg, bid). Asterisks indicate P <0.05 compared with controls. Note the physiological P4 withdrawal from day 18 to day 21 in non-treated rats, that is prevented by s.c. and topical P4, but not by vaginal P4. From Kuon et. al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:455 e1–9.

References

    1. Guyer B, Macdorman MF, Martin JA, Peters KD, Strobino DM. Annual summary of vitals statistics – 1997. Pediatrics. 1998;102(6):1333–1349. - PubMed
    1. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, et al. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:9–19. - PubMed
    1. Slattery MM, Morison JJ. Preterm delivery. Lancet. 2002;360:1489–1497. - PubMed
    1. Steer M. The epidemiology of preterm labor. BJOG. 2005;122 Suppl 1:1–3. - PubMed
    1. Muglia LJ, Katz M. The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:529–535. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms