Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry
- PMID: 21564114
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01294.x
Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry
Abstract
Improved dental adhesive technology has extensively influenced modern concepts in restorative dentistry. In light of minimal-invasive dentistry, this new approach promotes a more conservative cavity design, which basically relies on the effectiveness of current enamel-dentine adhesives. Nowadays, the interaction of adhesives with the dental substrate is based on two different strategies, commonly described as an etch-and-rinse and a self-etch approach. In an attempt to simplify the bonding technique, manufacturers have decreased the number of steps necessary for the accomplishment of the bonding procedure. As a consequence, two-step etch-and-rinse and one-step (self-etch) adhesives were introduced and gained rapid popularity in the dental market due to their claimed user-friendliness and lower technique sensitivity. However, many concerns have been raised on the bonding effectiveness of these simplified adhesives, especially in terms of durability, although this tends to be very material dependent. In order to blend all the adhesive components into one single solution, one-step adhesives were made more acidic and hydrophilic. Unfortunately, these properties induce a wide variety of seemingly unrelated problems that may jeopardize the effectiveness and stability of adhesion to the dental substrate. Being more susceptible to water sorption and thus nanoleakage, these adhesives are more prone to bond degradation and tend to fail prematurely as compared to their multi-step counterparts. Incidentally, another factor that may interfere with the bonding effectiveness of adhesives is the technique used for caries removal and cavity preparation. Several tools are on the market today to effectively remove carious tissue, thereby respecting the current trend of minimum intervention. Despite their promising performance, such techniques modify the tooth substrate in different aspects, possibly affecting bonding effectiveness. Altogether, we may conclude that not only the adhesive formulation, but also substrate nature must be taken into account to achieve a stable bonding interface, rendering the restorative treatment more predictable in terms of clinical performance. In this review, we analyse the current theoretical and clinical aspects of adhesion to enamel and dentine, and discuss the diverse possibilities to overcome problems which nowadays still challenge clinicians in their achievement of a more stable and effective bond to tooth enamel and dentine.
© 2011 Australian Dental Association.
Similar articles
-
Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive.Dent Mater. 2006 Jun;22(6):533-44. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.010. Epub 2005 Nov 21. Dent Mater. 2006. PMID: 16300826
-
Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin.Am J Dent. 2003 Dec;16(6):414-20. Am J Dent. 2003. PMID: 15002958
-
The effect of thermocycling on the adhesion of self-etching adhesives on dental enamel and dentin.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Feb 1;8(2):17-24. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007. PMID: 17277823
-
New developments in dental adhesion.Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Apr;51(2):333-57, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.01.001. Dent Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 17532916 Review.
-
New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion.Am J Dent. 2000 Nov;13(Spec No):25D-30D. Am J Dent. 2000. PMID: 11763914 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on the adhesion to eroded dentin.Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Jan;30(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1321-6. Epub 2013 May 7. Lasers Med Sci. 2015. PMID: 23649611
-
Effectiveness of Different Bonding Agents in Minimally Invasive Cavity Preparations.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2394-S2396. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_285_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024. PMID: 39346295 Free PMC article.
-
Modifying Adhesive Materials to Improve the Longevity of Resinous Restorations.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 8;20(3):723. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030723. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30744026 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations.Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):15-22. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126234. Eur J Dent. 2014. PMID: 24966741 Free PMC article.
-
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin-Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment.Materials (Basel). 2021 Jul 11;14(14):3870. doi: 10.3390/ma14143870. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34300788 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials