Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class
- PMID: 21567711
- DOI: 10.1002/bmb.20264
Using clickers to improve student engagement and performance in an introductory biochemistry class
Abstract
As part of ongoing efforts to enhance teaching practices in a large-class introductory biochemistry course, we have recently tested the effects of using a student response system (clickers) on student exam performances and engagement with the course material. We found no measurable difference in class mean composite examination score for students taught with clickers than for those taught in traditional lectures. However, there were significantly more students in the highest achievement category (91-100%) in the section that incorporated clickers than in any other section over five academic terms. Overall, students gave high approval ratings for the use of the clickers, particularly in increasing their participation and engagement in lectures. However, students who reported their performance to be in the lowest performance categories gave a lower level of approval for the use of the clickers than those who reported their performance to be in the higher performance categories. The implications for using clickers to improve teaching in biochemistry are discussed.
Copyright © 2009 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Acceptance of clickers in a large multimodal biochemistry class as determined by student evaluations of teaching: Are they just an annoying distraction for distance students?Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2016 Jan-Feb;44(1):99-108. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20917. Epub 2015 Oct 30. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2016. PMID: 26515808
-
Technology support in nursing education: clickers in the classroom.Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):295-8. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2009. PMID: 19824239
-
Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Spring;7(1):146-54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0060. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008. PMID: 18316817 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):60-71. doi: 10.1152/advan.00109.2007. Adv Physiol Educ. 2009. PMID: 19261762
-
The impact of clickers in nursing education: a review of literature.Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Nov;31(8):e34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Jan 13. Nurse Educ Today. 2011. PMID: 21232831 Review.
Cited by
-
Monitoring how changes in pedagogical practices have improved student interest and performance for an introductory biochemistry course.FEBS Open Bio. 2018 Mar 15;8(4):494-501. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12409. eCollection 2018 Apr. FEBS Open Bio. 2018. PMID: 29632803 Free PMC article.
-
Pros and Cons of Audience Response Systems in the Education of Health Professionals.MedEdPublish (2016). 2019 Sep 24;8:182. doi: 10.15694/mep.2019.000182.1. eCollection 2019. MedEdPublish (2016). 2019. PMID: 38089314 Free PMC article.
-
Using invention to change how students tackle problems.CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):504-12. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-02-0012. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010. PMID: 21123697 Free PMC article.
-
Interactive lectures: Clickers or personal devices?F1000Res. 2015 Mar 12;4:64. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6207.1. eCollection 2015. F1000Res. 2015. PMID: 26594327 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials