The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity
- PMID: 21568688
- DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1504
The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension: reliability and validity
Abstract
With the advent of new interventions targeted at both acute and chronic spinal cord injury (SCI), it is critical that techniques and protocols are developed that reliably evaluate changes in upper limb impairment/function. The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) protocol, which includes five subtests, is a quantitative clinical upper limb impairment measure designed for use in acute and chronic cervical SCI. The objectives of this study were to: (1) establish the inter-rater and test-retest reliability, and (2) establish the construct and concurrent validity with the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), Spinal Cord Independence Measure II (SCIM), and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE). The study protocol included repeated administration of the GRASSP to a cross-section of individuals with tetraplegia who were neurologically stable (n=72). ISNCSCI, CUE, and SCIM assessments were also administered. Two assessors examined the individuals over a 7-day period. Reliability was tested with intra-class correlation coefficients; construct validity was established with agreement/discordance analysis between the GRASSP and ISNCSCI sensory and motor items; and concurrent validity was tested with Spearman correlation coefficients. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability for all subtests within the GRASSP were above the hypothesized value of 0.80 (0.84-0.96 and 0.86-0.98, respectively). The GRASSP is about 50% more sensitive (construct validity) than the ISNCSCI when defining sensory and motor integrity of the upper limb; the subtests showed concurrence with the SCIM, SCIM self-care subscale, and CUE. The strongest concurrence to impairment was with self-perception of function (CUE) (0.57-0.83, p<0.0001). The GRASSP was found to demonstrate reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity for use as a standardized upper limb impairment measure for individuals with tetraplegia.
Similar articles
-
Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Sep;17(1 Suppl):65-76. doi: 10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1258. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22985372
-
Changes in Strength, Sensation, and Prehension in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: European Multicenter Responsiveness Study of the GRASSP.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):755-66. doi: 10.1177/1545968314565466. Epub 2015 Jan 7. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015. PMID: 25567122
-
Responsiveness, Sensitivity, and Minimally Detectable Difference of the Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility, and Prehension, Version 1.0.J Neurotrauma. 2016 Feb 1;33(3):307-14. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4217. Epub 2015 Dec 17. J Neurotrauma. 2016. PMID: 26560017
-
Quantitative testing in spinal cord injury: overview of reliability and predictive validity.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Sep;17(1 Suppl):141-50. doi: 10.3171/2012.5.AOSPINE1296. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22985380 Review.
-
Advanced Assessment of the Upper Limb in Tetraplegia: A Three-Tiered Approach to Characterizing Paralysis.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Summer;24(3):206-216. doi: 10.1310/sci2403-206. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 29997424 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension version 2 (GV2): Psychometric properties.J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):149-157. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1616950. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019. PMID: 31573454 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Remote Version of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensation, and Prehension (GRASSP): Validity and Reliability.Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 Feb-Mar;37(2-3):83-93. doi: 10.1177/15459683231162830. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023. PMID: 36987396 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted arm assessments in spinal cord injured patients: a consideration of concept study.PLoS One. 2015 May 21;10(5):e0126948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126948. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25996374 Free PMC article.
-
Minimal handgrip force is needed for transcutaneous electrical stimulation to improve hand functions of patients with severe spinal cord injury.Sci Rep. 2022 May 11;12(1):7733. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11306-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35545644 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of the upper limb in cervical spinal cord injury: Profiles of recovery and insights for clinical studies.J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Sep;37(5):503-10. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000252. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014. PMID: 25229734 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical