Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 May 15;43(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17.

The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States

Affiliations
Review

The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States

Dorian J Garrick. Genet Sel Evol. .

Abstract

Artificial selection has proven to be effective at altering the performance of animal production systems. Nevertheless, selection based on assessment of the genetic superiority of candidates is suboptimal as a result of errors in the prediction of genetic merit. Conventional breeding programs may extend phenotypic measurements on selection candidates to include correlated indicator traits, or delay selection decisions well beyond puberty so that phenotypic performance can be observed on progeny or other relatives. Extending the generation interval to increase the accuracy of selection reduces annual rates of gain compared to accurate selection and use of parents of the next generation at the immediate time they reach breeding age. Genomic prediction aims at reducing prediction errors at breeding age by exploiting information on the transmission of chromosome fragments from parents to selection candidates, in conjunction with knowledge on the value of every chromosome fragment. For genomic prediction to influence beef cattle breeding programs and the rate or cost of genetic gains, training analyses must be undertaken, and genomic prediction tools made available for breeders and other industry stakeholders. This paper reviews the nature or kind of studies currently underway, the scope or extent of some of those studies, and comments on the likely predictive value of genomic information for beef cattle improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Angus Association® - The Business Breed. http://www.angus.org/nce/genetictrends.aspx (Accessed 18 February 2011)
    1. Red Angus EDP Trends. http://redangus.org/genetics/epd-trends (Accessed 18 February 2011)
    1. Williams JL, Garrick DJ, Speidel SE. Reducing bias in maintenance energy expected progeny difference by accounting for selection on weaning and yearling weights. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:1628–1637. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1442. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Golden BL, Garrick DJ, Benyshek LL. Milestones in beef cattle genetic evaluation. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:E3–E10. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1430. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrick DJ, Golden BL. Producing and using genetic evaluations in the United States beef industry of today. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:E11–E18. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1431. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources