Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies
- PMID: 21570378
- DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.02.006
Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies
Abstract
Introduction: The literature has recently underlined the interest of pelvic and acetabular component orientation measurements in the standing and sitting position. Radiographic follow-up of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is based on standard AP and lateral X-rays. The use of EOS™ 2D imaging system reduces patient's radiation exposure compared to conventional X-rays. However, using this system, the validity and reproducibility of angular measurements, have not been studied yet for the measurement of pelvic and acetabular parameters in patients with THA.
Hypothesis: The EOS™ 2D imaging system offers similar advantages to conventional X-rays in the measurement of pelvic and acetabular orientation parameters which are commonly used.
Patients and method: Five angular parameters characterizing pelvic tilt and acetabular cup orientation were determined using the same digital measurement Imagika™ software based on two series of standard X-rays and EOS™ 2D images acquired in both standing and sitting positions. Radiographs from 50 patients with unilateral THA were measured three times by two observers. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility using each method was independently studied then paired comparison was performed.
Results: The ICC and Spearman rank correlation coefficient demonstrated an excellent EOS/conventional X-ray correlation. According to the parameters, the mean difference between these two imaging modalities ranged from 0.30° to 3.43° (P<0.05). The intra- and interobserver variability ranged from ± 2.97° to ± 6.46° using the EOS™ imaging system and from ± 4.26° to ± 10.22° using conventional X-rays (P<0.05).
Discussion: The EOS™ 2D imaging system may replace conventional X-rays in the assessment and monitoring of pelvic and acetabular cup orientation in THA.
Level of evidence: Level III. Prospective diagnostic study.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements (Acta Orthop 2015; 86 (4): 485-90.).Acta Orthop. 2016 Jun;87(3):314-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2016.1156932. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Acta Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26979301 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
