To ablate or not: a proposal regarding nomenclature

Abstract

Background: Vague and inexact word usage can complicate conversations about cutaneous energy devices, especially novel technologies.

Objective: To identify some areas in which descriptions of lasers, lights, and energy devices can be improved.

Methods: Ambiguities in descriptions of energy devices are addressed by suggesting sets of modifiers that are precise, accurate, simple, and mutually exclusive.

Results: Terms are proposed for distinguishing between devices that induce skin injuries of different depths. Additionally, descriptors are suggested for fractional treatments, fat melting, and cellulite reduction. Finally, we propose a scheme for clearly naming the underlying technology associated with any cutaneous energy device.

Limitations: Novel devices yet to be invented may not fit into the designations proposed and may require additional categories.

Conclusions: Simple changes in word usage may facilitate rapid and accurate communication regarding lasers, lights, and other energy devices.