A comparison of clinical officers with medical doctors on outcomes of caesarean section in the developing world: meta-analysis of controlled studies
- PMID: 21571914
- PMCID: PMC3272986
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d2600
A comparison of clinical officers with medical doctors on outcomes of caesarean section in the developing world: meta-analysis of controlled studies
Abstract
Objective: To review the effectiveness and safety of clinical officers (healthcare providers trained to perform tasks usually undertaken by doctors) carrying out caesarean section in developing countries compared with doctors.
Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.
Data sources: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, BioMed Central, the Reproductive Health Library, and the Science Citation Index (inception-2010) without language restriction.
Study selection: Controlled studies.
Data extraction: Information was extracted from each selected article on study characteristics, quality, and outcome data. Two independent reviewers extracted data.
Results: Six non-randomised controlled studies (16,018 women) evaluated the effectiveness of clinical officers carrying out caesarean section. Meta-analysis found no significant differences between the clinical officers and doctors for maternal death (odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 2.75; P=0.24) or for perinatal death (1.31, 0.87 to 1.95; P=0.19). The results were heterogeneous, with some studies reporting a higher incidence of both outcomes with clinical officers. Clinical officers were associated with a higher incidence of wound infection (1.58, 1.01 to 2.47; P=0.05) and wound dehiscence (1.89, 1.21 to 2.95; P=0.005). Two studies accounted for confounding factors.
Conclusion: Clinical officers and doctors did not differ significantly in key outcomes for caesarean section, but the conclusions are tentative owing to the non-randomised nature of the studies. The increase in wound infection and dehiscence may highlight a particular training need for clinical officers.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at
Figures
Comment in
-
"Non-physician clinicians" in low income countries.BMJ. 2011 May 13;342:d2499. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2499. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21571913 No abstract available.
References
-
- Pereira C, Bugalho A, Bergstrom S, Vaz F, Cotiro M. A comparative study of caesarean deliveries by assistant medical officers and obstetricians in Mozambique. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:508-12. - PubMed
-
- Mullan F, Frehywot S. Non-physician clinicians in 47 sub-Saharan African countries. Lancet 2007;370:2158-63. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical