Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Nov;5(6):664-74.
doi: 10.1177/1745691610388764.

Action's Influence on Thought: The Case of Gesture

Affiliations
Review

Action's Influence on Thought: The Case of Gesture

Susan Goldin-Meadow et al. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Nov.

Abstract

Recent research has shown that people's actions can influence how they think. A separate body of research has shown that the gestures people produce when they speak can also influence how they think. In this article, we bring these two literatures together to explore whether gesture has an effect on thinking by virtue of its ability to reflect real-world actions. We first argue that gestures contain detailed perceptual-motor information about the actions they represent, information often not found in the speech that accompanies the gestures. We then show that the action features in gesture do not just reflect the gesturer's thinking--they can feed back and alter that thinking. Gesture actively brings action into a speaker's mental representations, and those mental representations then affect behavior--at times more powerfully than do the actions on which the gestures are based. Gesture thus has the potential to serve as a unique bridge between action and abstract thought.

Keywords: action; embodied cognition; gesture; problem solving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Difference in time (top graph) and moves (bottom graph) taken to solve the TOH problem (TOH2 – TOH1) for adults who, after completing TOH1, explained how they solved the task and gestured about moving the disks (Gesture group, left bars); and adults who solved the task rather than explain it and thus actually moved the disks (Action group, right bars). In the Gesture group, adults in the Switch condition showed less improvement (i.e., a more positive change score) from TOH1 to TOH2 than adults in the No-Switch condition. In contrast, in the Action group, adults showed no difference between conditions.

References

    1. Alibali MW, Flevares L, Goldin-Meadow S. Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology. 1997;89:183–193.
    1. Alibali M, Goldin-Meadow S. Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: what the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology. 1993;25(4):468–523. - PubMed
    1. Barsalou LW. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1999;22:577–660. - PubMed
    1. Bavelas JB, Chovil N, Lawrie DA, Wade A. Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes. 1992;15:469–489.
    1. Beattie G, Shovelton H. Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 1999;18:438–462.

LinkOut - more resources