Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jan 1;21(2):127-146.
doi: 10.1080/10508422.2011.551470.

The Influence of Temporal Orientation and Affective Frame on use of Ethical Decision-Making Strategies

Affiliations

The Influence of Temporal Orientation and Affective Frame on use of Ethical Decision-Making Strategies

Laura E Martin et al. Ethics Behav. .

Abstract

This study examined the role of temporal orientation and affective frame in the execution of ethical decision-making strategies. In reflecting on a past experience or imagining a future experience, participants thought about experiences that they considered either positive or negative. The participants recorded their thinking about that experience by responding to several questions, and their responses were content-analyzed for the use of ethical decision-making strategies. The findings indicated that a future temporal orientation was associated with greater strategy use. Likewise, a positive affective frame was associated with greater strategy use. Future orientation may permit better strategy execution than a past orientation because it facilitates more objective, balanced contemplation of the reflected-upon situation, and minimizes potential self-threat associated with past behavior. A positive affective frame likely improves strategy execution because it facilitates active analysis of the experience. Future directions and implications of these findings are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ajzen I, Brown TC, Carvajal F. Explaining the discrepancy between intentions and actions: The case of hypothetical bias in contingent valuation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2004;30:1108–1121. - PubMed
    1. Alicke MD, Sedikides C. Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology. 2009;20:1–48.
    1. Antes AL, Brown RP, Murphy ST, Waples EP, Mumford MD, Connelly S, Devenport LD. Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 2007;2:15–34. - PubMed
    1. Antes AL, Mumford MD. Effects of time frame on creative thought: Process versus problem-solving effect. Creativity Research Journal. 2009;21:166–182.
    1. Antes AL, Thiel CE, Martin LE, Stenmark CK, Mumford MD, Devenport LD, Connelly S. Reflection on past experience as a source of knowledge to inform ethical decision-making. under review.

LinkOut - more resources