Looking Across Domains to Understand Infant Representation of Emotion
- PMID: 21572929
- PMCID: PMC3092399
- DOI: 10.1177/1754073910387941
Looking Across Domains to Understand Infant Representation of Emotion
Abstract
A comparison of the literatures on how infants represent generic object classes, gender and race information in faces, and emotional expressions reveals both common and distinctive developments in the three domains. In addition, the review indicates that some very basic questions remain to be answered regarding how infants represent facial displays of emotion, including (a) whether infants form category representations for discrete classes of emotion, when and how such representations come(b) to incorporate affective meaning, (c) the developmental trajectory for representation of emotional expression at different levels of inclusiveness (i.e., from broad to narrow or narrow to broad?), and (d) whether there is superior discrimination ability operating within more frequently experienced emotion categories.
References
-
- Bar-Haim Y, Ziv T, Lamy D, Hodes RM. Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science. 2006;17:159–163. - PubMed
-
- Barrett LF. Emotions as natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1:28–58. - PubMed
-
- Behl-Chadha G. Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy. Cognition. 1996;60:105–141. - PubMed
-
- Bornstein MH, Arterberry ME. Recognition, discrimination, and categorization of smiling in 5-month-old infants. Developmental Science. 2003;6:585–599.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources