Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;21(10):2091-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2149-8. Epub 2011 May 15.

Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI

Affiliations
Free article

Delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial viability: low-dose high-pitch CT versus MRI

Robert Goetti et al. Eur Radiol. 2011 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of high-pitch delayed enhancement (DE) CT for the assessment of myocardial viability with MRI as the reference standard.

Methods: Twenty-four patients (mean age 66.9 ± 9.2 years) with coronary artery disease underwent DE imaging with 128-slice dual-source CT (prospective electrocardiography (ECG)-triggering) and MRI at 1.5 T. Two observers assessed DE transmurality per segment, and measured signal intensity (MRI) or attenuation (CT) in infarcted and healthy myocardium and noise in the left ventricular blood pool for calculating contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR).

Results: 75/408 (18.4%) segments in 18/24 patients (75.0%) showed DE in MRI, of which 28 segments in 10/24 (41.7%) patients were non-viable (scar tissue transmurality >50%). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT for diagnosis of non-viability were 60.7%, 96.8% and 94.4% per segment, and 90.0%, 92.9% and 91.7% per patient. CNR was significantly higher in MR (7.4 ± 3.0 vs. 4.6 ± 1.5; p = 0.018), and image noise significantly lower (11.6 ± 5.7 vs.15.0 ± 4.5; p = 0.019). Radiation dose of DECT was 0.89 ± 0.07 mSv.

Conclusions: CTDE imaging in the high-pitch mode enables myocardial viability assessment at a low radiation dose and good accuracy compared with MR, although associated with a lower CNR and higher noise.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 21;45(12):2042-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 2006 Feb 14;113(6):823-33 - PubMed
    1. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr;4(2):83-91 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2009 Nov;19(11):2576-83 - PubMed
    1. Eur Radiol. 2010 Nov;20(11):2565-71 - PubMed