Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct;36(10):1824-33.
doi: 10.1007/s11064-011-0500-8. Epub 2011 May 15.

Histamine H3 receptor agonists decrease hypothalamic histamine levels and increase stereotypical biting in mice challenged with methamphetamine

Affiliations

Histamine H3 receptor agonists decrease hypothalamic histamine levels and increase stereotypical biting in mice challenged with methamphetamine

Junichi Kitanaka et al. Neurochem Res. 2011 Oct.

Abstract

The effects of the histamine H(3) receptor agonists (R)-α-methylhistamine, imetit and immepip on methamphetamine (METH)-induced stereotypical behavior were examined in mice. The administration of METH (10 mg/kg, i.p.) to male ddY mice induced behaviors including persistent locomotion and stereotypical behaviors, which were classified into four categories: stereotypical head-bobbing (1.9%), circling (1.7%), sniffing (14.3%), and biting (82.1%). Pretreatment with (R)-α-methylhistamine (3 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly decreased stereotypical sniffing, but increased stereotypical biting induced by METH, in a dose-dependent manner. This effect of (R)-α-methylhistamine on behavior was mimicked by imetit or immepip (brain-penetrating selective histamine H(3) receptor agonists; 10 mg/kg, i.p. for each drug). Hypothalamic histamine levels 1 h after METH challenge were significantly increased in mice pretreated with saline. These increases in histamine levels were significantly decreased by pretreatment with histamine H(3) receptor agonists, effects which would appear to underlie the shift from METH-induced stereotypical sniffing to biting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Frequencies of stereotypy after a single administration of methamphetamine in mice pretreated with (R)-α-methylhistamine or vehicle. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). METH: methamphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.); 3MHA: 3 mg/kg (i.p.) (R)-α-methylhistamine; 10MHA: 10 mg/kg (i.p.) (R)-α-methylhistamine; Sal: saline (vehicle).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Different types of stereotypical behavior in response to saline or methamphetamine in mice pretreated with (R)-α-methylhistamine or vehicle. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). N.D., not detected. METH: methamphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). *P < 0.05, compared with the Saline challenge group (open column; Bonferroni/Dunn test). †P < 0.05, compared with the METH challenge group pretreated with 0 mg/kg (R)-α-methylhistamine (Bonferroni/Dunn test). ‡P < 0.05, compared with the METH challenge group pretreated with 3 mg/kg (R)-α-methylhistamine (Bonferroni/Dunn test).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Frequencies of stereotypy after a single administration of methamphetamine in mice pretreated with 10 mg/kg imetit, 10 mg/kg immepip, or vehicle. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). METH: methamphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.); Sal: saline (vehicle). *P < 0.05, compared with corresponding group pretreated with saline or imetit.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Different types of stereotypical behavior in response to saline or methamphetamine in mice pretreated with 10 mg/kg imetit, 10 mg/kg immepip, or vehicle. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). N.D., not detected. METH: methamphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). *P < 0.05, compared with the Saline challenge group (open column; Bonferroni/Dunn test). †P < 0.05, compared with the METH challenge group pretreated with saline (Bonferroni/Dunn test).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Hypothalamic histamine (A) and Nτ-methylhistamine content (B) in mice pretreated with 3 and 10 mg/kg (R)-α-methylhistamine. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). METH: methamphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). **P < 0.01, compared with corresponding saline-challenged mice (Fischer’s PLSD test). †P < 0.05, compared with saline-pretreated subjects (Fischer’s PLSD test).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Hypothalamic histamine (A) and Nτ-methylhistamine content (B) in mice pretreated with 10 mg/kg imetit and immepip. Values are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). METH: methamphetamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). **P < 0.01, compared with corresponding saline-challenged mice (Fischer’s PLSD test). †P < 0.05, †††P < 0.001, compared with saline-pretreated subjects (Fischer’s PLSD test).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ellinwood EH, Kilbey MM. Chronic stimulant intoxication models of psychosis. In: Hanin I, Usdin E, editors. Animal models in Psychiatry and Neurology. New York: Pergamon Press; 1977. pp. 61–74.
    1. Nishikawa T, Mataga N, Takashima M, Toru M. Behavioral sensitization and relative hyperresponsiveness of striatal and limbic dopaminergic neurons after repeated methamphetamine treatment. Eur J Pharmacol. 1983;88:195–203. - PubMed
    1. Robinson TE, Becker JB. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev. 1986;11:157–198. - PubMed
    1. Randrup A, Munkvad I. Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man. Psychopharmacologia (Berl) 1967;11:300–310. - PubMed
    1. Snyder SH. Catecholamines in the brain as mediators of amphetamine psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;27:169–179. - PubMed

Publication types