Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2011 Mar;20(1):28-39.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.328.

Smoking cessation in primary care - a randomized controlled trial of bupropione, nicotine replacements, CBT and a minimal intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Smoking cessation in primary care - a randomized controlled trial of bupropione, nicotine replacements, CBT and a minimal intervention

Hans-Ulrich Wittchen et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar.

Abstract

Background/aims: Smoking cessation has been shown to be effective in randomized controlled trials. It is unclear though, whether interventions also work in routine primary care.

Methods: In 167 primary care settings we conducted a randomized four-armed smoking cessation trial to examine the efficacy of a minimal intervention (MI; n = 81), cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n = 175), bupropion (BUP; n = 108) and nicotine replacements (NRT; n = 103). Overall, 467 current smokers were enrolled. Abstinence rates at the end of treatment (12 weeks) were 32.8% for MI patients, 34.8% for CBT, 35.3% for NRT, and 46.5% for BUP patients (ITT, intention to treat) (no differential effects). Retention rates were highest in the BUP group (59.3%) and lowest in the NRT group (50.5%). Completer findings were: MI, 56.4%; CBT, 64%; BUP, 79.3%; NRT, 69.2% (LOCF, lost to follow-up). No serious adverse events occurred during or after the medication phase. At 12-month follow-up continuous abstinence rates were: BUP, 29.0%; CBT, 20.9%; NRT, 29.6%; MI, 29.6%.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that established smoking cessation treatments are effective when applied by non-specialist primary care physicians. Our data supports a structured, multimodal treatment structure as core ingredient of successful smoking cessation in primary care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the progress through the phases of the trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention and assessment schedule.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in abstinence rates (%) in the intervention groups from baseline to 12‐weeks post‐assessment.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Washington DC, APA.
    1. Cottler L.B. (1990) The CIDI and CIDI‐substance abuse module (SAM): cross‐cultural instruments for assessing DSM‐III, DSM‐III‐R and ICD‐10 criteria. NIDA Research Monograph, 105, 220–226. - PubMed
    1. Cottler L.B., Robins L.N., Grant B.F., Blaine J., Towle L.H., Wittchen H.U., Sartorius N. (1991) The CIDI‐Core Substance ‐abuse and dependence questions ‐ cross‐cultural and nosological issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 653–658. - PubMed
    1. DiClemente C.C., Prochaska J.O., Fairhurst S.K., Velicer W.F., Velasquez M.M., Rossi J.S. (1991) The process of smoking cessation: an analysis of precontemplation, contemplation and preparation stages of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 295–304. - PubMed
    1. Fagerström K.O., Schneider N.G., Lunell E. (1993) Effectiveness of nicotine patch and nicotine gum as individual versus combined treatment for tobacco withdrawal symptoms. Psychopharmacology, 111(3), 271–277. - PubMed

Publication types