A randomized trial fo three cisplatin-containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a study of the Umbrian Lung Cancer Group
- PMID: 2157554
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02940294
A randomized trial fo three cisplatin-containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a study of the Umbrian Lung Cancer Group
Abstract
Survival in patients with locally advanced (stage III Mo) and metastatic (Ml) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is short. Phase II studies have reported objective responses ranging from 20% to 60% using cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimens, yet few have shown improvement in median survival. In our phase II pilot studies with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (VP-16), we observed a 26% response rate; with CDDP, VP-16, and mitomycin-C, a 38% response rate was obtained in advanced NSCLC patients. A total of 156 consecutive patients with locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC were randomized to one of three treatment arms to determine whether the chemotherapy protocols had any effect on response rate and median survival in a large, randomized study. Arm 1 consisted of CDDP (120 mg/m2 x 3 weeks); arm 2, of CDDP (120 mg/m2) and VP-16 (100 mg/m2 given i.v. on days 1-3), repeated every 3 weeks; and arm 3, of CDDP (120 mg/m2) and VP-16 (100 mg/m2 on days 1-3) given every 3 weeks, plus mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 on days 1, 21, and 42, then every 6 weeks, for a maximal dose of 100 mg). After 71 patients had been enrolled in the study, we stopped accrual in the CDDP arm due to a lack of response [1 complete response (CR) in 24 patients; 4%] and continued enrollment in the two combination-chemotherapy arms. In the CDDP/VP-16 arm a 30% response rate [1 CR, 18 partial responses (PRs)] was obtained, and in the CDDP/VP-16 mitomycin C arm a 26% response rate (4 CRs, 11 PRs) was seen among a total of 150 evaluable patients. Responses were observed in 31% of patients with favorable performance status (PS) (ECOG 0-1) vs 14% in patients with a poor PS (ECOG 2-3). Of patients with locally advanced disease (III Mo), 17 (33%) obtained an objective response, compared with 20 patients (20%) with metastatic disease. Median survival was 18 weeks in the CDDP arm, 35 weeks in the CDDP/VP-16 arm, and 37 weeks in the CDDP/VP-16/mitomycin C arm. The median survival in the multimodal chemotherapy arms was significantly greater than that obtained with CDDP alone. Toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression in the mitomycin C-containing arm (27%, wtto grade 3-4). Our study shows that combination chemotherapy using CDDP/VP-16 is active and safe in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients with a good performance status. The addition of mitomycin C did not improve the therapeutic response.
Similar articles
-
Superiority of three-drug combination chemotherapy versus cisplatin-etoposide in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial by the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research.Lung Cancer. 1995 Apr;12 Suppl 1:S125-32. doi: 10.1016/0169-5002(95)00428-4. Lung Cancer. 1995. PMID: 7551920 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the "Umbria" cooperative study.Semin Oncol. 1988 Dec;15(6 Suppl 7):52-5. Semin Oncol. 1988. PMID: 2851180 Clinical Trial.
-
Mitomycin C plus vindesine plus etoposide (MEV) versus mitomycin C plus vindesine plus cisplatin (MVP) in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase III multicentre randomised trial. The "Gruppo Oncologico Centro-Sud-Isole' (G.O.C.S.I.).Ann Oncol. 1996 Oct;7(8):821-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010761. Ann Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8922196 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized study of two vindesine plus cisplatin-containing regimens with the addition of mitomycin C or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer. 1990 Apr 15;65(8):1692-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900415)65:8<1692::aid-cncr2820650805>3.0.co;2-x. Cancer. 1990. PMID: 2156597 Review.
-
Taxol (paclitaxel) in the treatment of lung cancer: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience.Ann Oncol. 1994;5 Suppl 6:S45-50. Ann Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7865434 Review.
Cited by
-
Phase III randomized trial comparing moderate-dose cisplatin to combined cisplatin and carboplatin in addition to mitomycin and ifosfamide in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.Br J Cancer. 2000 Nov;83(9):1128-35. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1413. Br J Cancer. 2000. PMID: 11027424 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Pharmacoeconomic benefit of cisplatin and etoposide chemoregimen for metastatic non small cell lung cancer: An Indian study.Lung India. 2016 Mar-Apr;33(2):154-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.177448. Lung India. 2016. PMID: 27051102 Free PMC article.
-
Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37419867 Free PMC article.
-
The case for the introduction of new chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer in the wake of the findings of The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE).Br J Cancer. 2002 Aug 27;87(5):481-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600491. Br J Cancer. 2002. PMID: 12189541 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of mitomycin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the literature.Br J Cancer. 2001 May 4;84(9):1150-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1742. Br J Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11336463 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical