Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healing
- PMID: 21576142
- PMCID: PMC3130398
- DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0385
Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healing
Abstract
Using a comparative analysis of Navajo healing ceremonials, acupuncture and biomedical treatment, this essay examines placebo studies and ritual theory as mutually interpenetrating disciplines. Healing rituals create a receptive person susceptible to the influences of authoritative culturally sanctioned 'powers'. The healer provides the sufferer with imaginative, emotional, sensory, moral and aesthetic input derived from the palpable symbols and procedures of the ritual process-in the process fusing the sufferer's idiosyncratic narrative unto a universal cultural mythos. Healing rituals involve a drama of evocation, enactment, embodiment and evaluation in a charged atmosphere of hope and uncertainty. Experimental research into placebo effects demonstrates that routine biomedical pharmacological and procedural interventions contain significant ritual dimensions. This research also suggests that ritual healing not only represents changes in affect, self-awareness and self-appraisal of behavioural capacities, but involves modulations of symptoms through neurobiological mechanisms. Recent scientific investigations into placebo acupuncture suggest several ways that observations from ritual studies can be verified experimentally. Placebo effects are often described as 'non-specific'; the analysis presented here suggests that placebo effects are the 'specific' effects of healing rituals.
Figures
References
-
- Kaptchuk T. J. 1998. Powerful placebo: the dark side of the randomized controlled trial. Lancet 351, 1722–1725 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10111-8 (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)10111-8) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaptchuk T. J. 1998. Intentional ignorance: a history of blind assessment and placebo controls in medicine. Bull. Hist. Med. 72, 389–433 10.1353/bhm.1998.0159 (doi:10.1353/bhm.1998.0159) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaptchuk T. J. 2001. The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf? J. Clin. Epidemiol. 54, 541–549 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00347-4 (doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00347-4) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaptchuk T. J. 2003. Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence. BMJ 326, 1453–1455 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1453 (doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1453) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kaptchuk T. J., Kerr C. E., Zanger A. 2009. Placebo controls, exorcisms and the devil. Lancet 374, 1234–1235 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61775 (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61775) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical