Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 31;108(22):8990-5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100600108. Epub 2011 May 16.

Two-phase dynamics of p53 in the DNA damage response

Affiliations

Two-phase dynamics of p53 in the DNA damage response

Xiao-Peng Zhang et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The tumor suppressor p53 mainly induces cell cycle arrest/DNA repair or apoptosis in the DNA damage response. How to choose between these two outcomes is not fully understood. We proposed a four-module model of the p53 signaling network and associated the network dynamics with cellular outcomes after ionizing radiation. We found that the cellular response is mediated by both the level and posttranslational modifications of p53 and that p53 is activated in a progressive manner. First, p53 is partially activated by primary modifications such as phosphorylation at Ser-15/20 to induce cell cycle arrest, with its level varying in a series of pulses. If the damage cannot be fixed after a critical number of p53 pulses, then p53 is fully activated by further modifications such as phosphorylation at Ser-46 to trigger apoptosis, with its concentration switching to rather high levels. Thus, p53 undergoes a two-phase response in irreparably damaged cells. Such combinations of pulsatile and switch-like behaviors of p53 may represent a flexible and efficient control mode, avoiding the premature apoptosis and promoting the execution of apoptosis. In our model, p53 pulses are recurrently driven by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) pulses triggered by DNA damage. The p53-Mdm2 and ATM-p53-Wip1 negative feedback loops are responsible for p53 pulses, whereas the switching behavior occurs when the p53-PTEN-Akt-Mdm2 positive feedback loop becomes dominant. Our results suggest that a sequential predominance of distinct feedback loops may elicit multiple-phase dynamical behaviors. This work provides a new mechanism for p53 dynamics and cell fate decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic depiction of the integrative model. The model is composed of four modules, separately characterizing the DNA repair, ATM sensor, p53-centered feedback control, and cell fate decision. Four feedback loops are considered, i.e., the p53-Mdm2 and the p53-Wip1-ATM negative feedback loop, and the p53-PTEN-Akt-Mdm2 and the CytoC-Casp3 positive feedback loop. The transactivation of target genes by p53 is denoted by dotted lines. State transition is represented by arrow-headed solid lines, and the promotion and inhibition of state transition are separately denoted by circle-headed and bar-headed lines. Other processes are depicted by arrow-headed double lines.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Overview of the dynamics of the p53 network. Time courses of nc and the levels of ATM, p53, p21, and Casp3 at DIR = 3 Gy (A) or 5 Gy (B).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Initiation of p53 pulses by ATM pulses. (AB) The bifurcation diagram of ATM level vs. nc (A) and that of ATM level vs. kswip1 (B) with nc = 20. The stable and unstable steady states are indicated by thick and thin black lines, respectively. The minima and maxima of the limit cycles are denoted by open circles. (C) A single pulse in the levels of p53, ATM, and Wip1 at DIR = 1 Gy. (D) Time course of p53 level with kswip1 = 0 or 0.2 at DIR = 4 Gy. (E) The bifurcation diagram of p53 level vs. ksmdm2 with nc = 20. The same convention is used as in panels A and B. (F) The parameter plane spanned by kswip1 and ksmdm2 is divided into two regions, separately corresponding to oscillatory and nonoscillatory behaviors of p53.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Temporal evolution of the levels of proteins in the p53-centered feedback loops at DIR = 3 Gy (A) or 5 Gy (B).
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Dynamics of two forms of active p53 and their downstream targets. (A) Time courses of the levels of p53 arrester (black) and p53 killer (red) at DIR = 5 Gy. (B) Temporal evolution of the levels of p21 (black), Wip1 (red), p53DINP1(green), PTEN (cyan), p53AIP1 (purple), and Casp3 (blue) at DIR = 5 Gy. (CD) Time courses of the concentrations of p53 arrester (black), p53 killer (red), and Casp3 (blue) with kswip1 = 0 and DIR = 1 Gy (C) or kswip1 = 0.092 and DIR = 10 Gy (D). (E) The number of pulses in p53 arrester preceding apoptosis induction, nar, as a function of kswip1. (F) The fraction of apoptotic cells in a population of 2,000 cells, FA, vs. DIR with kswip1 = 0 (red), 0.09 (black), or 0.092 (blue).
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Effect of PTEN on p53 dynamics and cell fate decision. (A) The bifurcation diagram of p53 level vs. ksPTEN with nc = 20. The stable and unstable steady states are indicated by thick and thin black lines, respectively. The minima and maxima of the limit cycles are denoted by open circles. (B) Time courses of the levels of p53 killer and Casp3 with ksPTEN = 0 (blue), 0.105 (red), or 0.2 (black). (C) The fraction of apoptotic cells in a population of 2,000 cells vs. ksPTEN at DIR = 5 Gy. The inset is a zoom in of the curve. (D) The histograms of timing of apoptosis induction, TA (defined as the time point of Casp3 activation), with ksPTEN = 0.015 or 0.2. The time bin is 20 min.

References

    1. Murray-Zmijewski F, Slee EA, Lu X. A complex barcode underlies the heterogeneous response of p53 to stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9:702–712. - PubMed
    1. Wu X, Bayle JH, Olson D, Levine AJ. The p53-mdm2 autoregulatory feedback loop. Genes Dev. 1993;7:1126–1132. - PubMed
    1. Aylon Y, Oren M. Living with p53, dying of p53. Cell. 2007;130:597–600. - PubMed
    1. Vousden KH, Lane DP. p53 in health and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:275–283. - PubMed
    1. Weinberg RL, Veprintsev DB, Bycroft M, Fersht AR. Comparative binding of p53 to its promoter and DNA recognition elements. J Mol Biol. 2005;348:589–596. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms