The biologic behavior of hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton
- PMID: 2158114
- DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199005000-00011
The biologic behavior of hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton
Abstract
Eleven patients who previously had undergone elective facial osteotomy and in whom blocks of porous hydroxyapatite were implanted into osteotomy gaps later consented to open biopsy of the implant material. A total of 24 biopsies were harvested at a mean time of 10.2 months following implantation. Gross anatomic findings were recorded at the time of biopsy. Specimens were harvested from the zygomatic buttress of the maxilla (12), the piriform buttress of the maxilla (4), the maxillary interdental premolar region (2), and the anterior mandible (6). Histologic sections were examined undecalcified using a modified trichrome stain. Eight of the 11 patients were followed radiographically for a minimum of 24 months. In the absence of infection, there was rapid fibrovascular ingrowth and, provided there was contact with host bone, bone ingrowth. This was observed in 21 of 24 biopsy specimens. The extent of bone ingrowth, as judged qualitatively, was highly variable and did not correlate with the time interval from implantation, anatomic site, or surface area of bone-implant interface. A healing process involving an osteoid phase of bone maturation and suggestive of continued net bone production was consistently found. The gross anatomic, radiographic, and histologic findings are discussed and provide further insight into the biologic behavior of porous block hydroxyapatite implanted into the maxillofacial skeleton.
Similar articles
-
Porous block hydroxyapatite in orthognathic surgery.Angle Orthod. 1991 Fall;61(3):185-91; discussion 192. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0185:PBHIOS>2.0.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1991. PMID: 1656815
-
Tissue response to facial contour augmentation with dense and porous hydroxylapatite in rhesus monkeys.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Dec;47(12):1282-9. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(89)90725-8. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989. PMID: 2555468
-
Coralline porous hydroxylapatite as a bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery.J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987 Dec;45(12):1034-42. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(87)90160-1. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987. PMID: 2826733
-
Porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft substitute in maxillary augmentation. An histometric study.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1988 Jul;16(5):199-205. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(88)80047-7. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1988. PMID: 2900254
-
Porous hydroxyapatite granules for alloplastic enhancement of the facial region.Clin Plast Surg. 2000 Oct;27(4):557-69. Clin Plast Surg. 2000. PMID: 11039889 Review.
Cited by
-
Aesthetic Enhancement of the Brow using Hydroxyapatite.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1201-1210. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02793-y. Epub 2022 Mar 14. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35288761 Free PMC article.
-
Biomimetic strategies for bone repair and regeneration.J Funct Biomater. 2012 Sep 20;3(3):688-705. doi: 10.3390/jfb3030688. J Funct Biomater. 2012. PMID: 24955638 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstruction of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Defects with 3D-Printed Bioceramic Implants: Scoping Review and Clinical Case Series.J Clin Med. 2024 May 9;13(10):2805. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102805. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38792347 Free PMC article.
-
The fate of porous hydroxyapatite granules used in facial skeletal augmentation.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010 Aug;34(4):455-61. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9473-2. Epub 2010 Feb 26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010. PMID: 20186415 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of acrylic acid grafting and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide immobilization on fibrovascular ingrowth into porous polyethylene implants in rabbits.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;245(6):855-62. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0475-3. Epub 2006 Nov 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17119998
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources