Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Apr 27:4:19.
doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-4-19.

Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades

Ali S Raja  1 , Koenraad J Mortele, Richard Hanson, Aaron D Sodickson, Richard Zane, Ramin Khorasani
Affiliations

Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: trends over two decades

Ali S Raja et al. Int J Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: To assess patterns of use of abdominal imaging in the emergency department (ED) from 1990 to 2009.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on adult ED patients treated between 1990 and 2009 at our university-affiliated quaternary care institution. Examinations were coded by abdominal imaging modality: x-ray, sonography, CT, or MRI. Proportional costs for each imaging modality were evaluated using relative value units (RVUs). Chi-square tests were used to assess for significant trends.

Results: The intensity of abdominal imaging per 1,000 ED visits increased 19.3% from 1990-2009 (p = 0.0050). The number of abdominal CT scans per 1,000 ED visits increased 17.5-fold (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the number of abdominal MRIs per 1,000 ED visits increased from 0 to 1.0 (p < 0.0001), and the number of abdominal sonographs per 1,000 ED visits increased 51.6% (p = 0.0198). However, the number of x-ray examinations per 1,000 ED visits decreased 81.6% (p < 0.0001). Abdominal imaging RVUs per 1,000 ED visits increased 2.7-fold (p < 0.0001), due primarily to CT imaging, which accounted for 14% of RVUs in 1990 and 76% of RVUs in 2009.

Conclusions: The intensity of abdominal imaging examinations per 1,000 ED visits and the number of abdominal imaging RVUs increased significantly over a 20-year period. CT replaced x-ray as the most common abdominal imaging modality for evaluation of ED patients. In light of these increasing costs as well as the increased radiation exposure of CT, clinical decision rules and computerized decision support may be needed to ensure appropriate utilization of abdominal CT in the ED.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual number of ED visits.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of abdominal imaging studies per 1,000 ED visits.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Annual number of abdominal imaging studies per modality per 1,000 ED visits.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relative Value Units (RVUs) per 1,000 ED visits.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relative Value Units (RVUs) per modality per 1,000 ED visits.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Proportion of Relative Value Units (RVUs) attributable to each imaging modality.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, Gilley DB, Gray JE, Ibbott GS, Lipoti JA, Mahesh M, McCrohan JL, Stabin MG, Thomadsen BR, Yoshizumi TT. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. Radiology. 2009;253:520–531. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2532082010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raja AS, Wright C, Sodickson AD, Zane RD, Schiff GD, Hanson R, Baeyens PF, Khorasani R. Negative appendectomy rate in the era of CT: an 18-year perspective. Radiology. 2010;256:460–465. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091570. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Eng J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim K, Mahesh M, Gould R, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Miglioretti DL. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:2078–2086. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Radiation Tests Are Questioned - Baltimore Sun. http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2009-08-27/news/0908260128_1_tests-perf...