Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Dec 28;12(2):3260.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3260.

Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame

Affiliations

Accuracy of relocation, evaluation of geometric uncertainties and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial tumors using relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame

Saikat Das et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

The present study is aimed at determination of accuracy of relocation of Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. The study aims to quantitatively determine the magnitudes of error in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions, and determine the margin between clinical target volume to planning target volume based on systematic and random errors. Daily relocation error was measured using depth helmet and measuring probe. Based on the measurements, translational displacements in anteroposterior (z), mediolateral (x), and craniocaudal (y) directions were calculated. Based on the displacements in x, y and z directions, systematic and random error were calculated and three-dimensional radial displacement vector was determined. Systematic and random errors were used to derive CTV to PTV margin. The errors were within ± 2 mm in 99.2% cases in anteroposterior direction (AP), in 99.6% cases in mediolateral direction (ML), and in 97.6% cases in craniocaudal direction (CC). In AP, ML and CC directions, systematic errors were 0.56, 0.38, 0.42 mm and random errors were 1.86, 1.36 and 0.73 mm, respectively. Mean radial displacement was 1.03 mm ± 0.34. CTV to PTV margins calculated by ICRU formula were 1.86, 1.45 and 0.93 mm; by Stroom's formula they were 2.42, 1.74 and 1.35 mm; by van Herk's formula they were 2.7, 1.93 and 1.56 mm (AP, ML and CC directions). Depth helmet with measuring probe provides a clinically viable way for assessing the relocation accuracy of GTC frame. The errors were within ± 2 mm in all directions. Systematic and random errors were more along the anteroposterior axes. According to the ICRU formula, a margin of 2 mm around the tumor seems to be adequate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GTC frame with depth helmet fitted on a patient with dental occlusion and occipital pad. Radial measurements are taken with the help of the measuring probe at the depth helmet portal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Computed radiographic film of the head phantom fitted with GTC frame and the angiographic localizer box. Small lead target is placed at the center Lateral (left) and AP (right) images are taken and mismatch of the target compared to the fiducials are found. The direction of x, y and z axes are also illustrated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of random errors in anteroposterior, mediolateral and craniocaudal directions is normally distributed. As is seen from the figure, random error is more in anteroposterior axis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean radial displacements calculated for 10 patients from the displacements in AP, ML and CC axes. The values are well encompassed in a 2 mm margin and mean value is 1.03 mm ±0.34mm.

References

    1. Burton KE, Thomas SJ, Whitney D, Routsis DS, Benson RJ, Burnet NG. Accuracy of a relocatable stereotactic radiotherapy head frame evaluated by use of a depth helmet. Clin Oncol. 2002;14(1):31–39. - PubMed
    1. Schlegel W, Pastyr O, Bortfeld T, Gademann G, Menke M, Maier‐Borst W. Stereotactically guided fractionated radiotherapy: technical aspects. Radiother Oncol. 1993;29(2):197–204. - PubMed
    1. Hamilton RJ, Kuchnir FT, Pelizzari CA, Sweeney PJ, Rubin SJ. Repositioning accuracy of a noninvasive head fixation system for stereotactic radiotherapy. Med Phys. 1996;23(11):1909–17. - PubMed
    1. Bednartz G. Interim report of a randomized trial comparing two forms of immobilization of the head for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy [abstract]. Proceedings of the 48th Annual ASTRO Meeting; 2006 Nov. 5–9; Philadelphia, PA. Fairfax, VA: ASTRO; 2006. - PubMed
    1. Jaywant S. Immobilization in stereotactic radiotherapy: radionics GTC versus HNL [abstract]. Proceedings of the 48th Annual ASTRO Meeting; 2006 Nov. 5–9; Philadelphia, PA. Fairfax, VA: ASTRO; 2006.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources