Inclusion of non-viable neonates in the birth record and its impact on infant mortality rates in Shelby County, Tennessee, USA
- PMID: 21589834
- PMCID: PMC3094009
- DOI: 10.4081/pr.2010.e1
Inclusion of non-viable neonates in the birth record and its impact on infant mortality rates in Shelby County, Tennessee, USA
Abstract
Rates of infant death are one of the most common indicators of a population's overall health status. Infant mortality rates (IMRs) are used to make broad inferences about the quality of health care, effects of health policies and even environmental quality. The purpose of our study was threefold: i) to examine the characteristics of births in the area in relation to gestational age and birthweight; ii) to estimate infant mortality using variable gestational age and/or birthweight criteria for live birth, and iii) to calculate proportional mortality ratios for each cause of death using variable gestational age and/or birthweight criteria for live birth. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all Shelby County resident-linked birth and infant death certificates during the years 1999 to 2004. Descriptive test statistics were used to examine infant mortality rates in relation to specific maternal and infant risk factors. Through careful examination of 1999-2004 resident-linked birth and infant death data sets, we observed a disproportionate number of non-viable live births (≤20 weeks gestation or ≤350 grams) in Shelby County. Issuance of birth certificates to these non-viable neonates is a factor that contributes to an inflated IMR. Our study demonstrates the complexity and the appropriateness of comparing infant mortality rates in smaller geographic units, given the unique characteristics of live births in Shelby County. The disproportionate number of pre-viable infants born in Shelby County greatly obfuscates neonatal mortality and de-emphasizes the importance of post-neonatal mortality.
Keywords: African-American neonates.; extreme prematurity; fetal death; infant mortality rates; viability.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: the authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Infant mortality statistics from the 2003 period linked birth/infant death data set.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006 May 3;54(16):1-29. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006. PMID: 16711376
-
Effect of changing the stillbirth definition on evaluation of perinatal mortality rates.Lancet. 1995 Aug 19;346(8973):486-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91327-0. Lancet. 1995. PMID: 7637485
-
Infant mortality statistics from the linked birth/infant death data set--1995 period data.Mon Vital Stat Rep. 1998 Feb 26;46(6 Suppl 2):1-22. Mon Vital Stat Rep. 1998. PMID: 9524421
-
Infant mortality statistics from the 2004 period linked birth/infant death data set.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007 May 2;55(14):1-32. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007. PMID: 17569269 Review.
-
Brain death in pregnancy: a systematic review focusing on perinatal outcomes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 May;224(5):445-469. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.033. Epub 2021 Feb 16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33600780
Cited by
-
County-level Variation in Infant Mortality Reporting at Early Previable Gestational Ages.Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;31(5):385-391. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12376. Epub 2017 Jul 19. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28722799 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of women, infant, and children (WIC) services on birth weight before and during the 2007-2009 great recession in Washington state and Florida: a pooled cross-sectional time series analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02937-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020. PMID: 32345244 Free PMC article.
-
Associations Between Surface Mining Airsheds and Birth Outcomes in Central Appalachia at Multiple Spatial Scales.Geohealth. 2022 Oct 1;6(10):e2022GH000696. doi: 10.1029/2022GH000696. eCollection 2022 Oct. Geohealth. 2022. PMID: 36284528 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Northam S, Knapp TR. The reliability and validity of birth certificates. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:3–12. - PubMed
-
- MacDorman MF, Martin JA, Mathews TJ, et al. Explaining the 2001–02 infant mortality increase: data from the linked birth/infant death data set. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2005;53:1–22. - PubMed
-
- Balchin I, Whittaker JC, Steer PJ, Lamont RF. Are reported preterm birth rates reliable? An analysis of interhospital differences in the calculation of the weeks of gestation at delivery and preterm birth rate. BJOG. 2004;111:160–13. - PubMed
-
- Kirby RS. Invited commentary: using vital statistics databases for perinatal epidemiology: does the quality go in before the name goes on? Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154:889–90. - PubMed
-
- Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Allen AC, et al. Implausible birth weight for gestational age. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:110–113. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources