Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011;33(12):997-1004.
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.577123. Epub 2011 May 19.

Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: a prospective study

Annette Mercer  1 , Ian B Puddey
Affiliations

Admission selection criteria as predictors of outcomes in an undergraduate medical course: a prospective study

Annette Mercer et al. Med Teach. 2011.

Abstract

Background: In 1998, a new selection process which utilised an aptitude test and an interview in addition to previous academic achievement was introduced into an Australian undergraduate medical course.

Aims: To test the outcomes of the selection criteria over an 11-year period.

Methods: 1174 students who entered the course from secondary school and who enrolled in the MBBS from 1999 through 2009 were studied in relation to specific course outcomes. Regression analyses using entry scores, sex and age as independent variables were tested for their relative value in predicting subsequent academic performance in the 6-year course. The main outcome measures were assessed by weighted average mark for each academic year level; together with results in specific units, defined as either 'knowledge'-based or 'clinically' based.

Results: Previous academic performance and female sex were the major independent positive predictors of performance in the course. The interview score showed positive predictive power during the latter years of the course and in a range of 'clinically' based units. This relationship was mediated predominantly by the score for communication skills.

Conclusions: Results support combining prior academic achievement with the assessment of communication skills in a structured interview as selection criteria into this undergraduate medical course.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. ACER. 2010. Report on the 2010 Undergraduate Medicine and Health Sciences Admission Test. Australian Council for Educational Research.
    1. Birch ER, Miller PW. Tertiary entrance scores: Can we do better? Educ Res Perspect. 2007;34(2):1–23.
    1. Cullen W, Bury G, Leahy M. What makes a good doctor? A cross sectional survey of public opinion. Ir Med J. 2003;96(2):38–41. - PubMed
    1. Dobson I, Skuja E. Secondary schooling, tertiary entrance ranks and university performance. People Place. 2005;13(1):53–62.
    1. Edwards JC, Elam CL, Wagoner NE. An admission model for medical schools. Acad Med. 2001;76(12):1207–1212. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources