Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Aug;22(4):559-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 May 16.

Bacterial growth laws and their applications

Affiliations
Review

Bacterial growth laws and their applications

Matthew Scott et al. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011 Aug.

Abstract

Quantitative empirical relationships between cell composition and growth rate played an important role in the early days of microbiology. Gradually, the focus of the field began to shift from growth physiology to the ever more elaborate molecular mechanisms of regulation employed by the organisms. Advances in systems biology and biotechnology have renewed interest in the physiology of the cell as a whole. Furthermore, gene expression is known to be intimately coupled to the growth state of the cell. Here, we review recent efforts in characterizing such couplings, particularly the quantitative phenomenological approaches exploiting bacterial 'growth laws.' These approaches point toward underlying design principles that can guide the predictive manipulation of cell behavior in the absence of molecular details.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Bacterial growth laws: A. When growth is modulated by changes in nutrient quality, the RNA mass fraction r (proportional to the ribosomal content) of E. coli increases linearly with growth rate γ (solid line): r = r0 +γ/κt, where the parameter κt is related to the translation rate [8••], and r0 is the offset. When growth is modulated by changes in translational efficiency, a conjugate relation is observed. The RNA mass fraction is inversely related to growth rate (dashed lines): r = rmax −γ/κn, where the parameter κn describes the nutrient quality of the growth medium, and rmax is the maximum allocation to ribosomal synthesis in the limit of complete translational inhibition. B. Symmetric linear relations are observed in the mass fraction of a constitutively expressed protein, implying a linear constraint between ribosome-affiliated and constitutive proteins. C. The simplest constraint is a three-component partition of the proteome: a fixed fraction that is invariant to growth-rate change (blue), ribosome and ribosome-affiliated proteins (green) and the remainder (pink), including constitutive proteins. For E. coli K-12 MG1655, the fixed fraction appears to occupy roughly half of the protein fraction [8••].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Analogy with Kirchoff's law: The Monod-like relation for growth, Eq. (2), is mathematically identical to the description of electric current flow through a pair of resistors connected in series to a battery with voltage (1−ϕfixed). In this analogy, the growth rate γ is the current through the resistors. The translation- and nutrient- modes of growth limitation correspond to changing the conductance of one of the resistors, while the expression of unnecessary protein corresponds to changing the applied voltage by increasingϕfixed (see Fig. 3A).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Some applications of the growth laws: A. The burden of protein overexpression. Expression of an unnecessary protein (orange) effectively decreases the fraction allocable to the protein sectors responsible for protein synthesis (green) and nutrient uptake/processing (pink), leading to a decrease in the growth rate [8••]. B. Growth-mediated feedback. Constitutive expression of a toxin affecting nutrient influx (R) could lead to bistability through positive feedback generated by the interdependence of gene expression levels and growth rate (dotted line). A decrease in growth rate under conditions of nutrient limitation results in an increase in the constitutively expressed toxin R, reinforcing further growth rate reduction [7].

References

    1. Pleiss J. The promise of synthetic biology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;73:735–739. - PubMed
    1. Bio FABG, Baker D, Church G, Collins J, Endy D, Jacobson J, Keasling J, Modrich P, Smolke C, Weiss R. Engineering life: building a fab for biology. Sci Am. 2006;294:44–51. - PubMed
    1. Bhalerao KD. Synthetic gene networks: the next wave in biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:368–374. - PubMed
    1. Arkin AP, Fletcher DA. Fast, cheap and somewhat in control. Genome Biol. 2006;7:114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu TK, Khalil AS, Collins JJ. Next-generation synthetic gene networks. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:1139–1150. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types