Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun 17;332(6036):1446-8.
doi: 10.1126/science.1201574. Epub 2011 May 19.

The visual impact of gossip

Affiliations

The visual impact of gossip

Eric Anderson et al. Science. .

Abstract

Gossip is a form of affective information about who is friend and who is foe. We show that gossip does not influence only how a face is evaluated--it affects whether a face is seen in the first place. In two experiments, neutral faces were paired with negative, positive, or neutral gossip and were then presented alone in a binocular rivalry paradigm (faces were presented to one eye, houses to the other). In both studies, faces previously paired with negative (but not positive or neutral) gossip dominated longer in visual consciousness. These findings demonstrate that gossip, as a potent form of social affective learning, can influence vision in a completely top-down manner, independent of the basic structural features of a face.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of gossip stimuli. Examples of structurally neutral faces paired with: (A) negative gossip; (B) positive gossip; (C) neutral gossip; (D) negative non-social information; (E) positive non-social information; (F) neutral non-social information. See Supporting Online Materials for a complete list of sentences.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Depiction of a trial in the binocular rivalry task. In the binocular rivalry task, a neutral face was presented to one eye and a house to the other.

References

    1. Baumeister RF, Zhang L, Vohs KD. Rev Gen Psychol. 2004;8:111–121.
    1. Dunbar RIM. Rev Gen Psychol. 2004;8:100–110.
    1. Bliss-Moreau E, Barrett LF, Wright CI. Emotion. 2008;8:479–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blake R. Brain & Mind. 2001;2:5–38.
    1. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006;10:502–510. - PubMed

Publication types